Fudging on fees

Since 1995, the General Services Administration has financed its schedule purchasing program through the collection of a 1 percent (soon to be 0.75 percent) Industrial Funding Fee (IFF). This fee, which is incorporated into contractors' published schedule prices, is paid by purchasing agencies and then collected by contractors as part of the sales price. They pass it on to GSA on a quarterly basis.

Considerable confusion exists regarding whether contractors must pay the IFF on sales to federal purchasers outside GSA schedule contract buys. Such sales arise primarily in two contexts.

First, a contractor may sell a product from a schedule contract to a federal buyer under an unrelated federal contract. Second, a contractor may sell a nonschedule product to a federal buyer in conjunction with, but not as part of, a schedule sale (i.e., an "open-market" order).

GSA's guidance on those situations has been inconsistent. Some within the agency maintain that a contractor owes the IFF in both. Others argue that the fee is due only in the second scenario. But I submit that one would be hard-pressed to find legal support for an IFF payment in either situation.

In the first case, according to applicable federal regulations, a contractor's IFF payment is calculated on the value of sales "under [the schedule] contract." Obviously, a sale made under a different contract is not made under the schedule contract.

Purchasing agencies, however, do not always clearly identify the contract under which a purchase is being made. This puts contractors at a disadvantage because GSA takes the position — supported by some case law — that a federal purchase of products using a schedule contract is presumed to be a schedule purchase unless the agency says otherwise.

In the second scenario, a fee should not be owed, either. An open-market sale, by definition, is not a schedule sale.

Agencies must satisfy procurement competition requirements, and the purchase price typically does not include the IFF. Thus, a contractor should not have to remit the fee on such sales. Remember, it is supposed to be the agency that pays the IFF, not the contractor.

Against this background, it seems that a contractor can protect itself best by:

Instructing federal sales representatives to ask purchasers whether they are buying under the schedule contract. If not, they should reference the appropriate contract number on the purchase order and invoice.

Explicitly identifying open-market orders on GSA's price list and making clear that the price of such items does not include the IFF.

Maintaining clear and complete records regarding all federal sales.

Although these steps will not necessarily move GSA from its sometimes overly broad interpretation of the IFF clause, it will put contractors on more solid ground to defend themselves should the need arise.

Aronie is a partner in the government contracts group at Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton. He can be reached at jaronie@sheppardmullin.com.

The 2015 Federal 100

Meet 100 women and men who are doing great things in federal IT.

Featured

  • Shutterstock image (by venimo): e-learning concept image, digital content and online webinar icons.

    Can MOOCs make the grade for federal training?

    Massive open online courses can offer specialized IT instruction on a flexible schedule and on the cheap. That may not always mesh with government's preference for structure and certification, however.

  • Shutterstock image (by edel): graduation cap and diploma.

    Cybersecurity: 6 schools with the right stuff

    The federal government craves more cybersecurity professionals. These six schools are helping meet that demand.

  • Rick Holgate

    Holgate to depart ATF

    Former ACT president will take a job with Gartner, follow his spouse to Vienna, Austria.

  • Are VA techies slacking off on Yammer?

    A new IG report cites security and productivity concerns associated with employees' use of the popular online collaboration tool.

  • Shutterstock image: digital fingerprint, cyber crime.

    Exclusive: The OPM breach details you haven't seen

    An official timeline of the Office of Personnel Management breach obtained by FCW pinpoints the hackers’ calibrated extraction of data, and the government's step-by-step response.

  • Stephen Warren

    Deputy CIO Warren exits VA

    The onetime acting CIO at Veterans Affairs will be taking over CIO duties at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

  • Shutterstock image: monitoring factors of healthcare.

    DOD awards massive health records contract

    Leidos, Accenture and Cerner pull off an unexpected win of the multi-billion-dollar Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization contract, beating out the presumptive health-records leader.

  • Sweating the OPM data breach -- Illustration by Dragutin Cvijanovic

    Sweating the stolen data

    Millions of background-check records were compromised, OPM now says. Here's the jaw-dropping range of personal data that was exposed.

  • FCW magazine

    Let's talk about Alliant 2

    The General Services Administration is going to great lengths to gather feedback on its IT services GWAC. Will it make for a better acquisition vehicle?

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above