OMB reports progress with competition goals

A Bush administration report designed to promote its competitive sourcing initiative shows that controversy over the initiative is not likely to fade.

The Office of Management and Budget report, titled "Competitive Sourcing: Reasoned and Responsible Public-Private Competition," is intended to supplement a July report that examined five agencies to show how they were implementing rules to govern competitions between federal employees and private contractors.

The new report, dated September 2003, includes a summary of the workforce and competition plans for the 24 agencies the President's Management Agenda tracks.

Federal employee unions and some congressional Democrats have fought the measure since OMB began revising its Circular A-76, which lays out rules for conducting competitions. Although opponents have won some concessions from OMB and some legislative victories, the competitive sourcing initiative remains.

"You're not going to see the end of the battle this year," said Stan Soloway, the Professional Services Council's president. "I expect this to be a continuing battle for quite a while."

In some respects, opponents and supporters are simply on different sides of an ideological divide that is unlikely to be bridged, Soloway said. The Bush administration argues that competition is generally good and leads to better value for taxpayers no matter who wins. Opponents see the initiative as a push to privatize ever-larger pieces of the government, eliminating hundreds of thousands of federal jobs.

"Whatever the administration's rhetoric and whatever mechanism it is pushing at any given time, the objective is to move as many federal jobs as possible to the private sector," said Colleen Kelley, president of the National Treasury Employees Union.

However, Soloway believes that most policy-makers understand the importance of competitive sourcing, even though they may call for greater oversight. Even an amendment that Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) successfully added to OMB's appropriations bill forbidding the use of funds to carry out the revised A-76 permitted competitions under the old rules, Soloway pointed out.

Some have misgivings about an aggressive approach to opening jobs to outsourcing, but "there is equal discomfort with the idea that we're going to just shut down competition," he said. "There is a recognition that this needs to be done."

From a practical standpoint, agencies face some significant challenges in implementing the new Circular A-76, Comptroller General David Walker said. In written testimony he submitted Oct. 3 to the Senate Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce and the District of Columbia Subcommittee, he outlined some of them.

Chief among the challenges is a 12-month limit that the new circular places on most competitions. Walker, responding to written questions from subcommittee members, agreed that the time frame might be unrealistic. Data from the Defense Department shows that competitions often take an average of 25 months. However, the new A-76 mandates that some planning must occur before a public announcement of a competition, which could make it possible to carry out the process in a shorter amount of time.

Walker's General Accounting Office had previously recommended that OMB lengthen the time frame to 18 months. "We believe that additional financial and technical support and incentives will be needed for agencies as they attempt to meet the ambitious 12-month time frame," he wrote.

Specifically, Walker recommended establishing a fund at OMB that agencies could draw from to help conduct and manage the competition process.

OMB's new report emphasizes a customized plan for each agency and dedicated high-level management oversight to ensure that the process gets proper priority and effective management. Each agency should appoint a competitive sourcing official to accomplish that, under the revised A-76 guidelines.

The 2015 Federal 100

Meet 100 women and men who are doing great things in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image (by venimo): e-learning concept image, digital content and online webinar icons.

    Can MOOCs make the grade for federal training?

    Massive open online courses can offer specialized IT instruction on a flexible schedule and on the cheap. That may not always mesh with government's preference for structure and certification, however.

  • Shutterstock image (by edel): graduation cap and diploma.

    Cybersecurity: 6 schools with the right stuff

    The federal government craves more cybersecurity professionals. These six schools are helping meet that demand.

  • Rick Holgate

    Holgate to depart ATF

    Former ACT president will take a job with Gartner, follow his spouse to Vienna, Austria.

  • Are VA techies slacking off on Yammer?

    A new IG report cites security and productivity concerns associated with employees' use of the popular online collaboration tool.

  • Shutterstock image: digital fingerprint, cyber crime.

    Exclusive: The OPM breach details you haven't seen

    An official timeline of the Office of Personnel Management breach obtained by FCW pinpoints the hackers’ calibrated extraction of data, and the government's step-by-step response.

  • Stephen Warren

    Deputy CIO Warren exits VA

    The onetime acting CIO at Veterans Affairs will be taking over CIO duties at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

  • Shutterstock image: monitoring factors of healthcare.

    DOD awards massive health records contract

    Leidos, Accenture and Cerner pull off an unexpected win of the multi-billion-dollar Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization contract, beating out the presumptive health-records leader.

  • Sweating the OPM data breach -- Illustration by Dragutin Cvijanovic

    Sweating the stolen data

    Millions of background-check records were compromised, OPM now says. Here's the jaw-dropping range of personal data that was exposed.

  • FCW magazine

    Let's talk about Alliant 2

    The General Services Administration is going to great lengths to gather feedback on its IT services GWAC. Will it make for a better acquisition vehicle?

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above