What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Kundra: IT procurement needs improving

The Obama administration plans to improve the processes the government uses to buy information technology systems, the top federal IT official said today.

Federal chief information officer Vivek Kundra said administration officials are considering ways to transform the procurement process through improved access to information, better-defined requirements and more accountability. Kundra made the comments at a breakfast hosted by the Bethesda, Md., Chapter of AFCEA International.

“The current procurement process isn’t optimal for what the federal government needs, and this administration is committed to transforming that,” Kundra said. “We want to be able – from a central place in the federal government – to get input into the best ideas possible.

Kundra said the planned Data.gov Web site will enable the public and industry to access agency data and create new solutions the government can use. Democratizing agency data could help the government save money, he added.

In a brief interview after his remarks, Kundra said he is working with the General Services Administration to determine the causes of delays during the procurement process. He also said the administration recognizes that “a big part of the issues of federal IT have been, frankly, poor requirements from the federal government.”

“We’re not making the tough changes we need to. We’re not saying, ‘Hey, you awarded the contract — what happened? Why is it poorly written?’” Kundra said. “And…to be fair, we’re not holding the private sector accountable when things do go wrong.”

During his presentation, Kundra said it’s important for government and industry to ensure that requirements for systems are clear, and he called for a new mechanism to evaluate solutions. He also said the government’s process for writing requirements and proposals is overly complex.

"The federal government historically hasn’t done a good job of defining what those requirements are,” he said. “Then it engages in contracts, and because the needs haven’t been defined very well, you end up with 400-plus-change orders.”

In addition, Kundra said, even when the government buys commercial products, agencies often customize them to the extent that they are barely recognizable, which means that upgrades require a new product. Regardless of the type of technology, the government needs to get the best value for taxpayers.

“Those organizations that are going to stick to models that are embedded in charging the federal government without providing real value are going to become extinct,” Kundra said. “Those organizations that are going to provide the federal government with real value and move us forward and advance the taxpayers’ agenda are going to prosper.”

About the Author

Ben Bain is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

Reader comments

Fri, Apr 24, 2009

As a government employee in IT for 25 years it not the lack of requirements that I have seen as the problem. It is the rules and regulations that take forever to follow and implement The FAR is a relic of the 60's. Writing a phone book worth of spec might sound like a good idea but the goal is develop software that is flexible and dynamic which most modern systems demand - this is not practical, Even buying things like laptops shouldn't take 2 months-- but it DOES!

Fri, Apr 24, 2009

I am always amazed by the folks who aren't responsible for buying stuff when they talk about improving the process for buying stuff. This guy is a nut and if his experience in the District is a portend of what is to come for us in the Federal gov't, then we need to buckle up because we're end for a ride and when it's over we won't have anything to show for it and the IGs and GAO will be climbing all over us. Perhaps he should focus on the requirements side of the issue and leave the mechanics to those of us who actually know how to do this. I understand one of his great innovations is streaming bid openings - really, that's an improvement that will really make a difference?

Fri, Apr 24, 2009

Eliminate contracting controls? Worked well in the DC CTO office didn't it. Already interesting to see which yes people have flocked to the new CTO, CIO and CEO but were the cause of many problems in the past.

Fri, Apr 24, 2009 I'watching you Salem, OR

Vivek, I found it odd the day you came to Portland Oregon to present your project on Open Source that when I asked you if you were concerned about the health of the data you were displaying in your system was reliable and you told me that you did'nt worry or bother to verify it. Comming from you I expected to get an explanation of why not or which process you have used to verify. Now that you are offering these plans of what you want to do with acquisition; judging by the impression you left, I'm very doubtful of what you intend.

Fri, Apr 24, 2009 Peter G. Tuttle, CPCM

I certainly hope the Administration is serious, however I suspect that all this well-meaning rhetoric will translate into large consolidated requirements which will eliminate small business from any meaningful competition. The government consistently sells itself a bill of goods by preferring mega one-size-fits-all IT solutions which many times fail miserably and lock the feds into stale and outmoded technology. Congress “hinted” in the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996, Section 5202, that the use of incremental deployments of IT solutions was an effective acquisition strategy. Congress, on this one specific subject, appears to get it. Today, our technology has evolved to the point of where federal agencies can acquire the best solutions from a variety of vendors and integrate them, instead of depending on a single monolithic (and most likely noncompetitive) source. Defining and obtaining the best value – for the long term – requires more resources initially and for oversight, but the results will pay off, both for the taxpayer and the agency. This being said, given the concerns and the documented shortages in our acquisition workforce, finding the resources to achieve the best value – for the long term – may be difficult.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Desktop Virtualization: Better Management with Smaller Budgets Register Now

    This webcast will explore the benefits of desktop virtualization, and how the innovative technology can help agencies lower the cost of their IT infrastructure, improve end-user performance, while enabling a mobile workforce. A government expert will share real-life case studies of leveraging desktop virtualization solutions to enable secure telework policies, organization-wide IT infrastructure standards and extend the life of current hardware assets - Register Now!! Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.