What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Officials: Recovery act rules are the future

The strict acquisition regulations attached the stimulus money is a foretaste of what agencies and contractors can expect for the future, several government officials said in speeches April 23.

The law, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, has many transparency requirements, a strong emphasis on firm-fixed-price contracts and competition for those contracts, and demands for tracking the money to show what it yields. Procurement officials say these levels of transparency and oversight have never been demanded in such ways, and it’s only the beginning of what’s to come. A precedent has now been set, many experts have said.

“The stimulus is the wave of the future,” Soraya Correa, director of procurement operations at the Homeland Security Department, said at an event hosted by the American Small Business Coalition.

General Services Administration officials who also spoke said the law's requirements force agencies to keep a closer tabs on what they spend and how they spend it because the information will be public on Recovery.gov and agencies' own recovery Web sites.

“With revenue comes responsibility,” said Amanda Fredriksen, GSA’s deputy assistant commissioner for general supplies and services.

To boost transparency, the law requires agencies to publicize their bid proposals. Even if an agency buys a product or service from a GSA Schedule contract, the agency has to post a notice on the Federal Business Opportunities Web site for the sake of announcing it, which wasn’t required in the past.

The requirements will also reach into contractors’ books, officials said. Agencies will ask contractors for their spending and subcontracting information. And to remain in GSA’s Schedules program, companies must agree to adhere to the new requirements. GSA officials said companies can expect to hear from the agency soon.

“That means your data is out there,” Correa said to a group of small-business owners, adding that they need to make sure their books are in order and presentable because the information could be posted on the Internet.

David Drabkin, GSA’s acting chief acquisition officer, said the transparency theme has been moving ahead for at least two years. In December 2007, the Office of Management and Budget launched USASpending.gov as part of a law that then-Sen. Barack Obama helped introduce legislation known as the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act. While in Congress, he introduced a follow-up, which would have provided more information on the government’s contracting system, but it never became law.

In his same spirit of openness, the stimulus law, which pushes for contracts with nonadjustable prices, requires agencies to share their reasons for why a contract couldn’t be awarded with a set price. In the past, those justifications have stayed within the agency.

“People are going to be able to read the excuse you’re giving, and people are going to hold your feet to the fire,” Correa said. That likely will lead to more discussions between agencies and industry through more draft requests for proposals, in-depth market research and outreach to a broader range of companies, she said.

Drabkin said the stimulus spending reflects President Obama’s March 4 memo on his proposals for procurement reforms, such as greater competition for work, a preference for firm-fixed-price contracts, more transparency from agencies, and a stronger workforce to handle the immense amount of contracting work flooding into agencies.

Reader comments

Tue, Apr 28, 2009

Federal Government spending NEEDS to be tracked better. And they aren't saying businesses will need to change their accounting practices, just that those practices need to be able to stand scrutiny. People whining about these changes have obviously never been in a contracting position in the government. The amount of money my own particular section spent on annual replacements of furniture was ridiculous. I'm excited and hopeful that these changes will mean less waste. There is NO REASON for a section of roughly 8,000 people (or less) to spend upwards of $300K on furniture annually.

Tue, Apr 28, 2009 M

“With revenue comes responsibility.” Yes, the responsibility to deliver the services and/or products for which we contracted! Now we must do the government's accounting too. When will the federal government grow up and participate in the economy like most adults? Imagine if you bought something at Target or even a jewelry store and they had to track what revenue stream your purchase came from? Your tax return? You wife's salary or your? Sickening!

Tue, Apr 28, 2009

Having managed many firm-fixed price contracts as a COR, I'm glad the administration is seeing the importance of a responsible contracting vehicle. It takes work, on the government's part, to manage this type of contract but the rewards to the government are immense!

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Service Consolidation: How to Avoid Basic Pitfalls of Shared Services Register Now

    This is the first webcast of the Series “Future First: Three Steps to Data Center Transformation”. Plan to attend this webcast to support your agency efforts to design a practical roadmap for consolidation of resources and shared services to meet current and emerging program demands. Learn from those who are doing to help you evaluate services in your current operations that may lend themselves to future shared service arrangements. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.