Two alternative approaches

Card catalog, water cooler hope to connect the right people with the right information

The card catalog

Like a library’s card catalog, information indexes list metadata-based pointers to available information that might reside within and across several agencies.

Example: The Information Sharing Environment–Suspicious Activities Reporting system

Pros:

  • Indexes provide a comprehensive overview of available information, even if some of it resides at different organizations.
  • Indexes protect security and privacy by only showing high-level information, not personal or classified details.
  • Organizations continue to store their information in local databases instead of uploading it to large data warehouses managed by another group.

Cons:

  • Metadata tagging is time-consuming and prone to subjective descriptions by whoever creates the labels.
  • Any information that’s not indexed remains difficult to discover.
  • Indexes are used primarily for finished intelligence and text rather than evolving intelligence or information depicted graphically or spatially.

The water cooler

Traditional data-sharing model:

Push: Intelligence analysts, agency leaders and law enforcement officers don’t have a comprehensive way to know who might need to receive important new information.

Pull: Operatives, first responders and other homeland security officials might not know all the authoritative sources of critical information.

The problem: Information senders and receivers find one another in a haphazard fashion and can waste valuable time determining necessary clearances and authorizations.

Web 2.0 technologies such as wikis, blogs and other social-networking tools can allow ad hoc, real-time information sharing, just like those conversations around the office water cooler.

Examples: Intellipedia and A-Space

Pros:

  • Such technologies connect diverse groups and potentially large numbers of participants who might not otherwise work together.
  • They are relatively quick and easy to launch and require minimal training for participants.
  • They excel at presenting new, quickly unfolding information.

Cons:

  • Web 2.0 tools raise concerns about the completeness and timeliness of constantly changing information.
  • Unfinished intelligence might lack thorough evaluation by senior analysts.
  • Participation might include only a subset of possible contributors and might wane over time.

About the Author

Alan Joch is a freelance writer based in New Hampshire.

The 2014 Federal 100

FCW is very pleased to profile the women and men who make up this year's Fed 100. 

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above