What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Sharing of past-performance data now mandatory

A revised rule emphasizes the use of a standard database of performance information

A new revision to federal contracting rules requires agencies to share their assessments of contractors’ work with one another and consider past performance when awarding large task orders.

The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition Regulations Council have approved changes to the Federal Acquisition Regulation that primarily emphasize using a standard database of performance information. Agencies must store their evaluations of companies’ work in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) for other agencies to review, the councils said in a notice posted in the Federal Register July 1.

“The purpose of the final rule is to ensure that the FAR clearly reflects the use of the governmentwide performance information repository,” the notice states.

Agencies are to evaluate contractors’ work and enter the information into PPIRS at www.ppirs.gov. When other agencies are considering the same contractor for a similar job, they can visit the database to see if the company did a good job and met expectations. In the reviews, agencies look at whether or not the work was completed on time and within budget and how well the company worked with the agency as a business partner.

“Confidence in a prospective contractor’s ability to satisfactorily perform contract requirements is an important factor in making best-value decisions,” the PPIRS Web site states.

In addition, the councils’ rule change extends past-performance reviews beyond contracts. The rule would now require agencies to consider past performance for large orders placed under governmentwide and individual agencies’ indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contracts, the notice states.

The councils say the regulatory revision is in line with President Barack Obama’s March 4 memo on government contracting and will help agencies manage the risks involved in working with contractors.

“It is essential that the federal government have the capacity to carry out robust and thorough management and oversight of its contracts," Obama wrote in the memo.

Checking a company’s past performance can lessen the risks of outsourcing work, and it spurs companies to work harder to develop good records, the councils said.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is acquisition editor for Federal Computer Week.

Reader comments

Mon, Jul 6, 2009 Peter CA

Long overdue. Making a review of past performance a requirement of a source selection will reward those contractors who deliver more than a well-written proposal.

Mon, Jul 6, 2009

Having a central repository is fine.having this data as a requirement to award a contract works in detriment to small newly establish business-which are unable to build on "past performance" since they have no 'past"

Sun, Jul 5, 2009 Jaime Gracia Washington, DC

The typical information management problem of federal databases is persistent in the PPIRS; garbage in equals garbage out. Past performance data is crucial to evaluation of past performance of course, such as contract terminations for default and subcontract management. However, this data can also be a good indicator of future performance and the ability of contractors to perform at the level required by the government. This data should be specifically documented, relevant, and reliable. However, the GAO reported a very low confidence level for PPIRS in a recent report (GAO-09-374). Technical and Management capability are often the most important factors in source selections where the government seeks to award based on best value, which is often counterproductive to the realities of the government market. Further, this process actually hinders accountability as performance not only is poorly documented, but also not effectively integrated into proper program management techniques in the execution of government contracts. Getting past performance as the key to contract management oversight would go a long way to improving cost, schedule and performance goals and thus improving acquisition outcomes. However, better government oversight, accurate evaluations, and ensuring PPIRS gets used as intended will need serious improvement to use the data effectively.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

eSeminar

  • Where Cyberwarfare and Cybersecurity Meet

    We invite you to attend the third event in this three-part series on Cybersecurity. 1105 Government Information Group will present a panel of government and cybersecurity experts including Gregory T. Garcia, the nation's first presidentially-appointed Assistant Secretary for CyberSecurity and Communications with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2006-2008; and Jeffrey Carr, cyber strategies consultant and author of Inside Cyber Warfare, in this editorial webcast on Tuesday, April 13 at 11 a.m., where they will discuss the cyberwarfare threat to both industry and government, as well as strategies to consolidate the wider cybersecurity mission. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.

Highlights from the current issue