What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

OPM cuts security-clearance processing time

The investigation period has been decreased from a year to just under 40 days

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has significantly reduced the time it takes to process security-clearance background investigations, cutting the average time to just 37 days from the one-year period it took in 2001, said OPM Director John Berry.

In testimony Sept. 15 before a Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs subcommittee, Berry noted that his agency — which oversees much of the government’s clearance investigation work — is now exceeding federal timelines. The timelines require that decisions on at least 80 percent of initial clearances be made within an average of 120 days. Berry noted that OPM has eliminated a backlog of more than one-half million pending background investigations inherited from the Defense Department in 2005.

Four years ago, the average time needed to obtain a top secret security clearance was more than a year; today it is 72 days, Berry said. In 2009, OPM will complete more than 2 million investigations, he said.

“Our Investigative Service Division processes nearly 20 times as many cases as in 1997,” Berry said. “This is a remarkable increase in efficiency of service to the American public.”

Although progress has been made, Brenda S. Farrell, of the Government Accountability Office (GAO), told senators that more could be done. For example, GAO estimated backup documentation was incomplete for most initial top-secret clearances adjudicated in July 2008. And, greater attention to quality could increase instances of reciprocity — one entity’s acceptance of another entity’s clearances, Farrell said.

About the Author

Federal Daily, an 1105 Government Information Group site, features news and resources for federal and postal employees.

Reader comments

Fri, Oct 16, 2009 Joseph 1207 Tonka Avenue, Colorado Springs, CO 80904

June 2008, I applied for an agricultural specialist job with the US CBP. I received a letter dated 1/8/2009 from an employee of the personnel security division saying that I was unsuitable for employment. I knew that this was coming because I have been fired from jobs and had a misdemeanor 3rd degree assault in 2002. I responded immediately and sent a letter to the employee of the personnel security division and have had no correspondence since then with anybody about my background investigation. I know that I will probably not obtain employment with CBP but I think that they could have at least told me that back in March or April.

Tue, Sep 29, 2009

Yes, the investigations are being completed much quicker now, but what about the quality of the product. Many times, especially on the NACIs or ANACIs, the majority of the vouchers (inquiries) are not returned. Because OPM is under such strict guidelines to close the cases within a certain period of time, these cases are closed complete and sent to the agency for adjudication. Why are we paying for an incomplete case that we have to follow-up on ourselves? We are not getting a quality product.

Thu, Sep 24, 2009

The article fails to discuss how this change in time requirements for a clearance was accomplished. It's easy to claim increased efficiency.. does anyone remember the A-76 process?

Thu, Sep 24, 2009

They shouldn't be rushed, but have you gone through the clearance process? I had a TS clearance from the State Department. I got a new job at the Dept of Energy 4 years ago. Energy wouldn't accept my State clearance. It took TWO YEARS before I was cleared; my paperwork (with very personal information) was lost THREE TIMES. In those 2 years, I was not able to do my job effectively because I couldn't access much of the data or work on many of the projects without a clearance. If what OPM is saying is true, they've made huge progress in the past couple years, and my hat is off to them. And while the work should be done by federal employees, don't even get me started on how ridiculous the federal hiring process is--which deters the most qualified people for this kind of job from joining the government. I was paid during the 2 years I was uncleared, but most people aren't as fortunate...

Wed, Sep 23, 2009

Reciprocity is a significant issue and nearly impossible to resolve as each agency has it own perception of the risks its willing to accept and the corresponding level of investigation and mitigation that is required for potential issues. Additionaly, the differing missions of agencies also create differing thresholds as to what is an issue or not (nexus to the job). A past minor drug indiscretion may be a big issue for DEA but a non-issue for another agency.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

eSeminar

  • The Top 100 Government Contractors NickWakeman_60

    Washington Technology Editor in Chief Nick Wakeman hosted an eSeminar, highlighting the magazine’s 17th annual Top 100 issue and the fears and hopes driving today’s market. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.