Anatomy of the attack on RSA

A sophisticated attack last spring on cybersecurity vendor RSA and other defense contractors highlighted techniques that are the calling card of advanced persistent threat, an increasingly common type of hacking that targets information rather than financial theft.

This graphic illustrates the steps that were likely involved in the RSA breach, based on RSA’s accounts of the incident. However, experts note that APT attack methods are constantly evolving, so future probes might vary from the one depicted here.

Stage 1: Perform reconnaissance and attack preparation

Perpetrators probably used publicly available records from social media sites and other sources to gather information about the company’s systems and operations and identify employees to target. They also prepared the malware that would be used to exploit known vulnerabilities, take control of systems and extract data.

Stage 2: Launch a phishing campaign and penetrate defenses

Using a technique called spear phishing, the attackers sent official-looking but phony e-mail messages with the subject line “2011 Recruitment Plan” to selected RSA employees. One of them opened the message and an attached Excel spreadsheet file, which contained a zero-day exploit of an Adobe Flash vulnerability to create a backdoor the attackers would use to bypass RSA’s network security.

Stage 3: Plant malware and explore the target

The attackers then planted a customized variant of a remote system administration tool called Poison Ivy, which they used as a platform to snoop around RSA’s network and look for paths to the resources they wanted. They also used undisclosed techniques to gain access to users with higher privileges and to specific systems for later use.

Stage 4: Gather and steal information

The attackers operated in stealth mode as long as possible to avoid detection as they gathered the desired data and moved it to staging servers they selected at key locations inside RSA. There they aggregated, compressed and encrypted the data for extraction. They then transferred the files to an outside server, which acted as an electronic drop box for the stolen files.

Stage 5: Exploit the stolen information

Defense secrets and intellectual property are often the target of APT intrusions. In the case of the RSA breach, the attackers pilfered information related to the company’s SecurID product, which enables corporate and government customers to authenticate user access to their secure systems. Weeks later, Lockheed Martin defended itself against an attack that used information obtained in the RSA breach. Shortly after that, a leaked memo from an official at L-3 Communications said a recent attack against that company also involved compromised RSA information.

About the Author

John Zyskowski is a senior editor of Federal Computer Week. Follow him on Twitter: @ZyskowskiWriter.

Featured

Reader comments

Mon, Aug 8, 2011 Jim F

Amen Ray,
And I agree that coverage of this type of story has been frequent enough to dull our senses to the vulnerability that we are creating for ourselves. The move to everything on the cloud or everything over IP has generated enough momentum that it is now a familiar term. Unfortunately that means that both parties in Washington have grabbed onto the trend because of its sound bite value as cost saving rhetoric.
My biggest concern is in taking our infrastructure to the cloud. SCADA systems are being brought into the IP world and afforded remote access via the cloud with little thought being placed on if that is the best idea. Yes there are savings to be made via unified infrastructure and maintenance and corporate may have a better handle on measurement and optimization, but the two environments, their operational demands, and associated tolerance for risk are quite different. The internet was never designed to be a secure environment for commerce or data exchange. In our excitement for a communications revolution we are taking giant leaps that bypass some amount of evolution that might better address the new cyber threats. And yes, it is to garner greater returns not to create a better solution.

Mon, Aug 8, 2011 RayW

You see variants of this story all the time, so much so that it is getting to be a *YAWN* story. Yet often in the same email this comes in (there is one in the email this came in) you see the hype for the "cloud" computing, which makes it even easier to perform attacks over a wider audience.

Cloud computing at the lowest level is coming, there is too much money sunk into it for certain people to back out of it and many folks want to be tethered to the net 24/7 just in case something that might be interesting pops up. But be prepared for even more stories like this, just look at the number of "cloud" systems currently off line because of "issues". CAC based systems at that.

My point? Disgust at the greed that is driving a technology that makes it easier for attacks to occur.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above