Innovation center to tackle government tech problems

The government is getting a hand with solving the most pressing issues facing federal IT. A new innovation center will tackle some of the challenges around technology and provide recommendations on how to move forward amid shrinking budgets.

The American Council for Technology-Industry Advisory Council has opened the Institute for Innovation, which will take on up to five projects every year to address IT issues that directly impact government and industry. The ultimate goal is to have a more formalized process to identify challenges and implement structure around problem-solving within federal IT, said Jim Beaupre, chairman at ACT-IAC. 

ACT-IAC has often provided the government with insight and recommendations on federal IT struggles. When it was time for the Veterans Affairs Department in 2009 to modernize its healthcare information system, ACT-IAC assembled a working group to assess the issues, challenges and opportunities, Beaupre said.

The council’s more recent involvement was when the Office of Management and Budget solicited ideas from industry on new approaches to acquire financial management IT systems, a project in which 52 ACT-IAC member companies participated, Beaupre said

The institute will first tackle the Quadrennial Government Technology Review and provide recommendations on how technology can make government more efficient in times of budget cuts, Beaupre said. The findings and recommendations by ACT-IAC members and subject matter experts will then be provided to the next administration’s leadership and other senior government officials.

As a bipartisan project, the institute will work to be as open as possible and vendor and product agnostic, Beaupre said. “This process is very transparent,” he stressed. “There’s no hiding behind closed doors.”

The institute will also follow principles that ban business development promotion and lobbying. Additionally, all of the institute’s funding will come from private-sector businesses that become members of the institute’s Innovator Circle and other not-for-profit organizations.

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

The 2014 Federal 100

FCW is very pleased to profile the women and men who make up this year's Fed 100. 

Reader comments

Fri, Feb 3, 2012 John Weiler United States

I can understand why a trade association might want to gain the moral hegemony of a true think tank. There is a very objective report on real think tanks produced annually. http://www.gotothinktank.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/2011GlobalGoToThinkTanksReport-UNEditionWITHOUTLETTER.pdf

Wed, Jan 25, 2012 Not the IT Cartel

You got to be kidding. IAC/ACT needs another source of funding and think that someone is going to see this as a non-lobby effort. The recommendations of IAC/ACT are already compromised by vendor interests, and this new think tank will be more of the same. Not buying it. Hope the feds see wolf in sheep's clothing.

Wed, Jan 25, 2012 Honest Broker United States

What a joke. Another "me too" trade association trying to gain some moral hegemony using the auspices of a conflict free think tanks. Real think tanks like CSIS, Potomac Institute, CAP, etc, are laughing out loud. What is really pathetic is that some less informed SESs will thing there is some unique value just because they put these white washed the old model with a new name.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above