COMMENTARY

Putting the GSA Humpty Dumpty back together again

Bob Woods is president of Topside Consulting Group and former commissioner of the General Services Administration’s Federal Technology Service.

As a former General Services Administration leader, this has been a painful time for me and my former colleagues. Not only do we believe GSA is still relevant and needed, but it is time for some real and positive change.

In my first all-hands meeting as commissioner of GSA’s Federal Technology Service in the mid-1990s, I confided to our employees that I was a 25-year dissatisfied customer of the agency. Although I believed in capitalizing on the federal government’s buying power to save the taxpayer money, I believed strongly that some at GSA had lost sight of the importance of agency customers and the ultimate customer, the American taxpayer. I secretly worried that such criticism could turn even our most dedicated employees against my agenda.

I could not have been more wrong. Our employees worked hard to serve our customers and provide IT and telecommunication services to them at unprecedented low prices. By the time I retired, we had driven long-distance telephone rates to levels not offered anywhere else in the world. Commercial rates followed ours, and residential rates followed the commercial ones.

Although current events are taking their toll on the agency’s leadership, there is reason for hope and optimism. In the political and bureaucratic world of government, it is important to never let a crisis go unused or unheeded. The deeds of Jeffrey Neely and his colleagues are signs of other lapses in judgment governmentwide. While lawmakers on Capitol Hill rail about their outrage, key leadership positions are allowed to sit unfilled for months and years. We have a better chance of being killed by a meteor than having a federal budget done on time — that’s Oct. 1, in case the last 13 years without an on-time budget have dulled your memory.

The current crisis should be examined for what it says about the need for fundamental change at GSA and other federal agencies. It is time to form a commission or task force of the Hoover variety to examine the causes of the current failures and determine what fixes are needed. The examination should be analytical, objective and nonpartisan. GSA performs a function that needs to be done and done well. Forcing that type of function back to the back rooms of individual agencies is not progress.

The next steps in the current saga will not be easy ones. The bloodletting and examinations are not over and might not be over for weeks or months. When they are done, GSA needs to be reformed according to today’s rules and realities.

To start with, GSA has too many regions with too much autonomy. In the name of local innovation and empowerment, those 11 administrative units deliver 11 flavors of service with 11 interpretations of the rules and business processes. Customers and industry have long figured out how to shop for the answers they want and the conditions they prefer. Next, GSA needs a budget process overseen by the customers they serve. I cannot imagine a customer board of directors ever approving the conference that took place in this most recent debacle. And finally, there needs to be some basic training for senior managers on what it means to be good stewards of taxpayer dollars.

During a recent vacation, I saw a linen kitchen towel in a New Orleans gift shop. It said, “What happens tonight is on Facebook tomorrow.” I guess the conference planning group missed that one.

About the Author

Bob Woods is president of Topside Consulting Group and former commissioner of the General Services Administration’s Federal Technology Service.

The 2014 Federal 100

Get to know the 100 women and men honored this year for going above and beyond in federal IT.

Reader comments

Sat, May 12, 2012 Bob Ramos

While a number of things at GSA need fixing, what really bugs me are the Congressional hearings that are being put on by the Repubs for publicity sake only. The standard fare goes like this: Issa gives a speech full of hypocirtical sayings; the witnesses give a preliminary statement; the committee members than denounce the GSA, etc and that eats up about 90% of their time and the routine is repeated by each member. All these guys are after is their time on TV.

Thu, May 3, 2012 Former GSAer

I wonder if there is the energy and the interest to implement these wise and thoughtfull recommendations. Leaders of Bob's ilk don't happen often and their advice is not always heeded. He was my commissioner when I was at GSA. I still remember he refused to have a car and driver like the other commissioners. The money was used to send our future leaders to school to get their MBA. Those of us that graduated from the program still toast him when we get together. And we pay for our own.

Wed, May 2, 2012 Bill Piatt Huddleston, VA

Bob's comments are very much on target. It is time for GSA to function as one cohesive organization and to truly live up to its oft-stated desire to be the epitome of excellence in customer service - in every region, in a systematic and predictable manner. There is a HUGE need for this, and a great, unfilled opportunity for GSA.

Wed, May 2, 2012 BMP

Part of the problem as well is that while a Regional Director for something (say Network Services or Fleet) has a dotted line to the associated Assistant Commissioner at FAS or PBS HQ, they are evaluated purely within the regional structure so regional directives/policies/desires take precedence. Revise the performance system to give the HQ functional lead written input into a performance evaluation (like an intermediate or senior rater in the military system) and those priorities start to shift.

Wed, May 2, 2012 SPMayor Summit Point, WV

Sage advice

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above