GSA’s push to curb spending begins to bear fruit

It sounds like the name for a scavenger hunt, but the Great Ideas Hunt at the General Services Administration has a different kind of prize.

It is part of the "top-to-bottom review" that Acting Administrator Dan Tangherlini launched after revelations about overspending at a conference led to the resignation of Administrator Martha Johnson. The Hunt, launched in May, asks employees to share their best ideas on how to improve agency operations. Close to six weeks after the submission period ended, officials announced Aug. 22 they are implementing the best of those ideas in hopes to save more than $5.5 million.

In addition to these five ideas, the agency is reviewing 40 other ideas submitted through the program, and expects to implement many of them on an ongoing basis, officials said. The original idea of the top-to-bottom review was to get the agency's employees involved in improving the agency's spending habits, Tangherlini said.

A total of 632 proposals came in from employees nationwide, and GSA staff then voted for their favorites.The five that GSA is implementing first:

  • Subscribe to digital editions of newspapers and magazines rather than print. Annual savings: Up to $630,000.
  • Scrap a redundant employee survey. Annual savings: $1 million.
  • Turn the paper-based Public Buildings Service Tenant Satisfaction Survey into a web-based version. Annual savings: $1.2 million.
  • Expand the agency's PrintWise policy agencywide so that printed documents will use both sides of a page. Annual savings: $2.7 million.
  • Open up the Great Ideas initiative to the public.

On that last one, for which the annual savings will depend on the ideas that come in and get implemented, three employees suggested GSA build an external website to allow federal partners and vendors to share ideas and feedback on how GSA can better manage its offerings.

Outside of GSA, reaction was mixed. Stephen Ellis, vice president at Taxpayers for Common Sense, offered a tepid approval.

"At least it's a start," he said. "Most of the reforms seem like common sense, so you do wonder why they didn't just do them and not waste the time patting themselves on the back,” he said. “Of course, most of the press the GSA has gotten recently has been of the negative variety, so that certainly factors in. The biggest takeaway is don't stop there. It's not just about fixing a few things; it's about fixing a culture that has been insular and prone to waste. We will be looking for even more aggressive cost-cutting measures from GSA in the future.”

But Scott Amey, general counsel at the Project On Government Oversight, was more laudatory.

 "GSA's efforts should be applauded and replicated by other agencies,” he said.  “Government employees are filled with many cost- and productivity-saving ideas, and it's about time that senior officials listen and implement them. GSA's program might also help decrease the negative stigma on whistleblowing, as government employees become more comfortable stepping forward with good government ideas.”

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Thu, Aug 23, 2012

GSA needs to get back to working on the things they were established to do - saving the taxpayer money by managing and supporting the basic functioning of federal. If GSA saves just one percent of all the money that goes through them in a year the Government would save billions. The “system” worked as it relates to the lavish conferences. The culprits were identified, charged, punished, dismissed or retired and appropriate changes have been made. GSA got into trouble by taking their focus off of their mission. Continuing with witch hunts & clever schemes that play nice in the press does nothing for the Government or the taxpayer.

Thu, Aug 23, 2012

"Expand the agency's PrintWise policy agencywide so that printed documents will use both sides of a page. Annual savings: $2.7 million." Figuring out how to get the printers to print on both sides. Annual cost: $2.8 million. Seriously, imagine that a NYSE-listed company announced cost-cutting measures to its investors and stated, "We will now be printing on both sides of the page! That's right...both sides!!!" Their stock would immediately plummet because it would be obvious that if that is the type of measures you're touting, the effort is obviously not genuine. Of course, GSA may be severely hamstrung by the public employee unions, but still...

Thu, Aug 23, 2012 JimS DC

Call me cynical, but Fed is the worst offender in over-promising and under-delivering when it comes to cost savings. I'll believe these projections when I see #'s reported in 2014. When was the last time their projections actually came to fruition? And even if there are realized cost savings, potus wants to "reinvest" the savings into some other initiative...which, by definition, is not real savings. We've been told the american public is addicted to oil; that may be true, but it's a fact that our Gov't is addicted to tax revenue. I've certainly benefitted from the infrastructure we've all paid for, and am not complaining about paying my share. But i am not willing to continue to give our Gov't a blank check. They need to make significant cuts in spending and make tax reform/simplification a priority. Only after those are done am I willing to talk about spending more/"reinvesting". You don't continue to give an addict what it wants...that's called enabling.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above