Sequester

Delegate lays blame for sequester

furloughed worker

Eleanor Holmes Norton expressed support for federal employees who may soon have some required unpaid time off. (Stock image)

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) is not pulling any punches in her criticism of those responsible for the sequester, saying the across-the-board budget cuts are more an ideological point for certain lawmakers than economic best practices.

"It should be understood that who really controls Congress is not the overall Congress – not the Republicans or the Democrats, but the very large number of Tea Party Republicans," she said. "This large number of people who defy the best of economic analysis and insists only upon cuts, essentially all leading the pack and making it more difficult for others to step outside the pack."

The District of Columbia's non-voting congressional representative kicked off the Federal Managers Association’s annual convention March 4 in Washington, D.C., with a morning keynote that emphasized the federal workforce's recent struggle with pay freezes and sweeping budget cuts currently being enforced.

"There are no precedents to guide you as you have to manage your way during a period when you have to ditch long-term planning and even tear up yesterday’s short-term plans or reassure and motivate employees with no assurance yourself of what the next day will bring," Norton said. "You can’t promise them much."

Federal managers also have to consider furloughs for employees who can "ill afford a day without pay" to reach the savings required by the sequester, Norton said. "You even had to contemplate furloughing yourselves!" she added with incredulity. "I’m not sure that any manager in the history of our country ever had to contemplate laying themselves off."

In light of the escalating anti-federal sentiments and the cuts aimed at the workforce to achieve savings, Norton said she hoped federal employees are used to being rhetorical punching bags.

"If you have an antigovernment point of view, then you see federal employees as representatives of the government – but it’s Congress that’s representative of the government," she pointed out.

The constant targeting of the federal workforce "borders on an addiction, and it’s time to go cold turkey," Norton said. Instead of persistently tapping federal employees for more savings, subsidies to corporations should be stopped, she said, because "why in the world should we give any tax breaks for such profitable companies?"

Norton, who serves on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, last week announced she would offset the impact of the sequester on her staff by donating some of her pay in solidarity – a decision she called "a small action."

"Your pay," she said to the audience, "and the pay of my own employees is subject to the political whims of members of Congress who enjoy constitutional protection against the cuts they’re needlessly visiting on federal employees, managers, the public, and the economy. Donating a day’s pay for whatever number of furlough days is no sacrifice to me."

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Reader comments

Wed, Mar 6, 2013

This is one of the most blatantly one-sided political hack articles that I have had the misfortune to read. I understand that Ms. Norton wants to blame her political opposition. But where is the corresponding article laying out the Republican, Tea Party and conservative positions? Why isn't FCW reminding readers that the initial poposal for a sequester came from the Obama Whitehouse, not the House or Senate. Where is the outrage over the fact that the Democrat-controlled Senate has failed to address a national budget for over 4 years? These are some of the issues that you should be addressing.

Tue, Mar 5, 2013

The Republican controlled House was the only group to put forward a plan to reasonably deal with the sequester. The Dems did nothing but politic For a Dem to make such a statement otherwise is almost laughable if the situation was not so sad. But with the media in their back pocket, they know that they can continue to get away with lie after lie - with at least enough people to keep them in power.

Tue, Mar 5, 2013

I like how the blame is put on the Republicans in Congress, while the Senate has not been in the loop yet and does not have a say in their raises or the funding bills that supposedly the Congress has sent to them?

About the only thing I see that looks good is the pointing out that all the focus seems to be on the hired help (federal workers), and nothing toward the rest of the money pot (industry which pays bribes, although in this country we do not call it bribes).

Tue, Mar 5, 2013 Bruce Majors DC

Delegate Norton has been in Congress since the early 90s. She's a fossil and part of the problem, having racked up debt under three presidents. She has 3 Congressional offices to represent one city, and spends $400,000, around 2 dollars a vote, in the PAC money she raises, to run unopposed every election. She couldn't cut a budget if you glued scissors to her hand and gave her paper with a "cut here" guideline. Until we get rid of tax leaches like her there will be no progress.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above