People

Why Spires is on leave

DHS CIO Richard Spires

Department of Homeland Security CIO Richard Spires, shown here testifying before Congress, has been on elected leave since March 15. A fundamental disagreement over CIO authorities is at least part of the reason.

Department of Homeland Security CIO Richard Spires remains out of the office, and has now been on leave for a full month. The reasons for that absence, however, are beginning to come into focus.

Speculation surrounding Spires' leave has been rampant, with much of it linked to testimony he missed before the House Homeland Security Committee’s Oversight and Management Efficiency Subcommittee on March 19. Yet one of the few things DHS officials have stated publicly was that the leave "was not related in any way" to the testimony.

FCW has learned that Spires' leave was precipitated by a fundamental disagreement with DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano over the CIO's authority over department-wide budgeting and purchasing of commodity IT. According to a source familiar with the dispute, Spires was attempting to centralize such purchasing as instructed by the Office of Management and Budget in an August 2011 memo on CIO authorities. That document declared that CIOs "shall pool their agency's purchasing power across their entire organization to drive down costs and improve service for commodity IT."

Component agencies within DHS objected to Spires' efforts, and complained to Napolitano, the source told FCW. Soon after a meeting that included Spires, Napolitano and Deputy Secretary Jane Holl Lute in which Napolitano sided with the component agencies, Spires went on leave.

John Palguta, vice president for policy at the Partnership for Public Service, stressed that he had no knowledge of Spires' situation but said the move could be a mutual agreement between DHS management and Spires. Palguta added that a political appointee taking extended personal leave "doesn't happen a lot."

Because of Spires' status as a political appointee, his elected leave is paid. Appointees do not accrue leave time and can, with management agreement, take elected leave indefinitely. But like many details surrounding Spires' situation, the ultimate length of this leave remains unclear.

Margie Graves, the department's deputy CIO, remains acting CIO in accordance with DHS protocol, and DHS officials have not released an official statement since news of Spires' leave broke on April 1. Multiple speaking engagements for the CIO have been cancelled or have featured other DHS officials in Spires' place.

Spires became DHS' CIO in 2009 after serving as CIO at the Internal Revenue Service during the second George W. Bush administration. He also has two decades of experience in the private sector.

Spires is also vice chairman of the CIO Council. Per the council’s charter, the executive committee, which includes Spires, meets monthly.

Requests for comment to the Office of Management and Budget regarding Spires' role were not returned immediately. And Spires has declined to respond to multiple direct inquiries from FCW.

The 2014 Federal 100

FCW is very pleased to profile the women and men who make up this year's Fed 100. 

Reader comments

Wed, May 29, 2013 Really?

Political appointees DO earn leave.

Mon, Apr 22, 2013

Sounds to me like a lot of little CIO's who have inflated titles and oversized egos, are feeling threatened that they may lose their fiefdoms . Too many quarterbacks who dont want to be team players. I watched the panel testify. The reform is needed. Spires is right. Kudos to him for doing the right thing, not to mention doing as he was told.

Mon, Apr 22, 2013

Interesting. Bet this came down to Fed vs Contractor and turf wars. And yet when they move it all to the cloud it still will not work better or more cheaply because they haven't sat down to figure out how to create an enterprise solution by doing any analysis of what is really needed and necessary.

Wed, Apr 17, 2013

This sort of thing tells me that Issa's new FITARA legislation is just another windmill to be tilted. Trying to make CIOs effective by giving them more resources is bass ackwards. How about removing them when they are not effective. Also see the VA case along with the DHS failure.

Tue, Apr 16, 2013 Homeland Security IT Staff Washington, DC

Adding a bit to the discussion, Mr. Spires, while an excellent strategic CIO and competant executive, has consistently failed to govern his staff or appoint and promote competant IT professionals. His current staff have implemented (pardon the language) piss-poor private cloud and data center consolidation projects e.g. did you know that one of our data centers is out of space and data center costs have spiralled out of control due to government incompetance and private sector malfeasance!?! It is no wonder that the component CIOs "revolted" when Spires sought to consolidate DHS IT Spend (current centralized budget only accounts for about 10% of DHS-wide IT spend, see IT Dashboard.) If applied to current initiatives, the components would be spending more for much less while rewarding bad behavior (by both the government and companies like CSC and HP.) Good for Secretary Napolitano and the other CIOs of DHS. The FedRAMP public/private cloud could not be developing at a better time. We need to get out from under the corporate stranglehold and move to a competive infrastructure and software as a service approach using best of breed providers like Amazon, Google, and (yes) Microsoft not to mention the niche players like Salesforce.com, Box.net, etc... The old ways are not working and if it takes removing someone like Spires to move forward then so be it. Mr. Spires has truly attempted to do the right thing although he does not posses the organizational development skills of a real government executive (few do like CIO Darren Ash of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission [rated top 3 best places to work by Partnership for Public Service])

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above