Health IT

CMS amped up cloud capacity a day before HealthCare.gov launched

Placeholder Image for Article Template

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services rushed to add cloud computing capacity to HealthCare.gov as the result of tests conducted just days before the site's scheduled Oct. 1 launch last year, according to contracting documents released on Jan. 24.

CMS modified the contract of Verizon-owned Terremark Federal Group to the tune of $8.7 million to add infrastructure "not contemplated at the time of the award," according to the document justifying the limited-source award. The contracting officer noted in the justification that Verizon and CMS could not have foreseen the need for additional capacity at the time the original contract was awarded. The adjustment raised the value of Terremark's hosting contract from $37.2 million to just over $46 million.

Performance and stress tests conducted on Sept. 24, 2013, confirmed the need for additional capacity because the Terremark cloud could support only 10,000 concurrent users, not the 50,000 CMS anticipated during peak traffic times. The original task order to Terremark did not specify a number of concurrent users.

CMS indicated that Terremark was "in the best position to add the required capacity as quickly as possible to their cloud environment." The document was signed on Sept. 30 by CMS CIO Tony Trenkle, who has since left for a private-sector job.

Hewlett-Packard will replace Terremark on the cloud-hosting contract at the end of the March open enrollment period for people to buy or change coverage via the health insurance exchanges on HealthCare.gov.

Left unsaid is what prompted CMS to seek additional infrastructure bandwidth. However, a related document explains the decision to contract with Accenture for continued development of the Federally Facilitated Marketplace after a flawed launch under contractor CGI Federal. That document, signed by then-acting CMS CIO David Nelson on Dec. 27, 2013, provides a laundry list of some of the deep problems in the development of the site and details ongoing problems with the creation of a financial management system to support subsidy payments under the Affordable Care Act.

Under a one-year, $91.1 million contract, Accenture is tasked with building a financial management platform that monitors eligibility and enrollment, tracks payments to insurance carriers and supports the calculation of tax obligations with Internal Revenue Service systems. That platform is due in mid-March. Failure to deliver on time will "result in financial harm to the government," the document states. Absent a financial management platform, "the entire health care reform program is jeopardized."

CMS decided to switch from CGI Federal in December after the contractor failed to deliver promised software to check for duplicate enrollments, track enrollment problems with insurance carriers and calculate tax credits. Accenture is also being asked to shore up existing pieces of the Federally Facilitated Marketplace that were still failing as recently as December, despite months of repair work led by prime contractor Quality Software Services Inc. and a government team led by former acting Office of Management and Budget Director Jeff Zients.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is FCW's senior staff writer, and covers Congress, health IT and governmentwide IT policy. Connect with him on Twitter: @thisismaz.

The 2015 Federal 100

Meet 100 women and men who are doing great things in federal IT.

Featured

  • Shutterstock image (by venimo): e-learning concept image, digital content and online webinar icons.

    Can MOOCs make the grade for federal training?

    Massive open online courses can offer specialized IT instruction on a flexible schedule and on the cheap. That may not always mesh with government's preference for structure and certification, however.

  • Shutterstock image (by edel): graduation cap and diploma.

    Cybersecurity: 6 schools with the right stuff

    The federal government craves more cybersecurity professionals. These six schools are helping meet that demand.

  • Rick Holgate

    Holgate to depart ATF

    Former ACT president will take a job with Gartner, follow his spouse to Vienna, Austria.

  • Are VA techies slacking off on Yammer?

    A new IG report cites security and productivity concerns associated with employees' use of the popular online collaboration tool.

  • Shutterstock image: digital fingerprint, cyber crime.

    Exclusive: The OPM breach details you haven't seen

    An official timeline of the Office of Personnel Management breach obtained by FCW pinpoints the hackers’ calibrated extraction of data, and the government's step-by-step response.

  • Stephen Warren

    Deputy CIO Warren exits VA

    The onetime acting CIO at Veterans Affairs will be taking over CIO duties at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

  • Shutterstock image: monitoring factors of healthcare.

    DOD awards massive health records contract

    Leidos, Accenture and Cerner pull off an unexpected win of the multi-billion-dollar Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization contract, beating out the presumptive health-records leader.

  • Sweating the OPM data breach -- Illustration by Dragutin Cvijanovic

    Sweating the stolen data

    Millions of background-check records were compromised, OPM now says. Here's the jaw-dropping range of personal data that was exposed.

  • FCW magazine

    Let's talk about Alliant 2

    The General Services Administration is going to great lengths to gather feedback on its IT services GWAC. Will it make for a better acquisition vehicle?

Reader comments

Wed, Jan 29, 2014

Don't peg this on the CO. The CO is not the technical expert that defines needed capacity. That is the program office. This is a comment written by someone that has done both. They document the file and justify the contractual action based on the information they receive from the project manager. Whoever posted below blaming the CO clearly doesn't have a base of knowledge needed to comment. Therefore don't.

Tue, Jan 28, 2014

The contracting officer could not have forseen the need for $8.7 million additional capacity? Really? That person should not be a contracting officer any longer.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above