What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Acquisitive Mind

By Matthew Weigelt

Blog archive

Is acquisition training for project managers adequate?

A change in thinking over the last several years has expanded the acquisition workforce beyond the General Schedule-1102 contracting officer and others in the same office. The project and program managers and the contracting officer’s representatives (CORs), who deal with both sides of the procurement, are significant players in making a successful acquisition.

But one expert believes project managers taking some training courses may be getting little useful information on their important role in a procurement. In other words, they may not have much to take back to the office.

“I am finding this acquisition section [of the courses] to be very Spartan and not actually preparing and educating project managers,” Jaime Gracia, president and CEO of Seville Government Consulting, a federal acquisition and program management consulting firm, wrote Jan. 18 in a post on GovLoop.

He wrote that after reviewing and auditing some courses, they generally include a section on procurement, as it relates to the overall cycle of a project. All the courses do, though, is meet the minimum requirements to earn credits toward training certifications.

Which courses? Gracia didn't say. But, based on your experience, are Gracia’s comments on procurement training for project managers true?

Considering his view of the procurement training for project managers, Gracia asked three questions in his post as well. The answers may help in providing project managers better acquisition training.

- What kind of things do you typically do as a project manager at your agency regarding procurement?

- What roles and responsibilities do you have as a project manager in a procurement?

- As project manager, what should you be doing that others are already doing or that aren't being doing at all?

The Acquisitive Mind would like answers those questions whether you are a project manager or know someone who is.

Posted by Matthew Weigelt on Jan 19, 2012 at 11:26 AM


Reader comments

Tue, Jan 24, 2012

I don't think training is the problem in many cases. Unfortunately, the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable training is usually the one that is awarded a contract. By doing so, and "checking the box", agencies are reducing the value of training. In the end, training should be designed to CHANGE BEHAVIOR (why else go to training but to learn new skills). Whats missing to ensure success and guarantee a return - on - investment of Federal money is the "BIG picture". Training is not an event, but rather a process. Organizations need to have processes in place that support new behavior, and align policies with the new skills of the employees. Management need to support new ways of doing the things that are learned in training. Without the policies, processes, and support, LPTA box-checking will continue, and no true value will be realized.

Fri, Jan 20, 2012 Jaime Gracia Washington, DC

@RayW's story is not unique, as mandatory training that combines a foundation of AQM with PM is relatively new. The scope of the training is also changing, and will hopefully be mandatory for all PMs to have a foundation of training similar to FAC P/PM, that includes ACQ fundamentals.

Fri, Jan 20, 2012 RayW

I am currently working on three new programs as a test engineering resource. On one project the program manager was gov and thought ACQ training was a joke and did not bother to do more than to say "not time yet" when I tried to get my side stood up, until the unit was fielded and then he could not understand why we were not ready to support the field and bad mouthed us until I slapped a bunch of emails in front of him in a finger pointing meeting to prove that he was not being honest. He left behind a mess and was promoted to Washington DC to help add spread the messiness. The PM's on the other two projects are contractors and they do not have to take ACQ since it is not in their contracts.

That said, I made level 1. Most of what I learned would be great at the large scale project level, however I work on the smaller scale of one subsystem like a new radio or a new radar. I have the tools to go after the big ticket items, but at the lower level much of what we do is not covered or appear to be exempt. I have used some of the citations and had the PM and contractor back down and rethink things, but if they dug more deeply there are a lot of loop holes that they can slide through, if they found them.

In conclusion, ACQ training is a one size fits all, large, and the small projects are not being forced to have PM's that are ACQ trained.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Desktop Virtualization: Better Management with Smaller Budgets Register Now

    This webcast will explore the benefits of desktop virtualization, and how the innovative technology can help agencies lower the cost of their IT infrastructure, improve end-user performance, while enabling a mobile workforce. A government expert will share real-life case studies of leveraging desktop virtualization solutions to enable secure telework policies, organization-wide IT infrastructure standards and extend the life of current hardware assets - Register Now!! Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.