TheConversation

Blog archive

Is Obama sincere about transparency?

image of obama on phone

On a story reporting the Obama administration's mixed record for transparency, an anonymous commenter writes: Lack of progress in government transparency is due to the example set at the very top. Based on the actions done ... it is obvious that the actual call for it from this president was all political for obtaining power and not for any improvement in the government.

Camille Tuutti responds: The Center for Effective Government does point out in its report, and so did Gavin Baker in his interview with me, that Obama has taken several strides to make the government more open -- and it does not appear to be just a power grab. For example, one of the first things he did as president was to create a searchable website of logs of White House visitors. It was the first time ever that type of information was made available. Also, during the first two years of the first term, several senior White House staffers worked on transparency reforms. "To its credit, the administration has taken some steps to ensure its transparency policies are enacted," the report summed up. There is no lack of White House-directed policies concerning openness; it is in implementation that shortcomings show. Clearly, more work remains to be done -- and not just by Obama. The recommendations in this report are directed not just at the president, but also to those at the top of the org chart at agencies, as well as legislators.

Posted by Camille Tuutti on Mar 11, 2013 at 12:10 PM


Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Tue, Mar 12, 2013

The intent of the "all political for obtaining power" comment was that the focus is to give the appearance of doing something good to get elected/supported in his grab for power. In reality this "transparency" only applied to the people far below the White House while the President's people were far less transparent - as pointed out by the first commentor. The point is this lack of leading by example likely contributed to the atmosphere for others that this "transparency" is more just politcal talk so there was less incentive for them to provide substantial transparency.

Tue, Mar 12, 2013

I have no doubt that he minimal actions taken to add transparicy to the administration are important, but are they as important as say, coming clean on who gave the order to not help American citizens who where being butchered in Bengazi. I think that is more important than who visited the WH at 9 AM on Dec 12th.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above