Close

FCW Insider

Blog archive

FCW Insider: What Obama's CPO has said about government performance

At this point, no one is certain how Nancy Killefer plans to carry out her duties as chief performance officer for the incoming Obama administration. But we do have an idea of how Killefer sizes up the job, thanks to an August 2006 article she co-authored for Business Week magazine.

In the article, Killefer, then a senior partner at McKinsey and Co., noted that the past decade had been "one of America's finest in terms of productivity growth" -- in most areas at least.

"Despite numerous attempts at management reform and a panoply of opportunities to transfer best practices between the private and public sectors, government seems to have missed out on the productivity boom seen in the private sector," wrote Killefer and Lenny Mendonca, a senior partner and chairman of the McKinsey Global Institute.

"That's a shame, because while there are important differences between the public and private sectors, government does an abundance of grantmaking, procurement, property management, customer service, and other jobs ripe for productivity improvement."

So how can the government close this "public productivity deficit"? The answer is found in a McKinsey whitepaper, published at the same time. Their recommendations fall in two areas: Transparency and transformation.

Under transparency, the McKinsey team suggests measuring government productivity, adopting an ambitious productivity growth target and bringing true transparency to government performance.

Under transformation, they recommend creating incentives to boost productivity, investing in agency management capability, and strengthening the emphasis on management at the Office of Budget and Management.

Posted by John S. Monroe on Jan 07, 2009 at 9:18 AM


Reader comments

Thu, Jan 22, 2009 Sharon

One excellent example of the ineffectiveness of current operating procedures is the continuing need to increase a projects budget and schedule. How many special reports must be done to indicate that one of the major reasons is lack of accurate requiremnts definition - by the users? Yet the process still has not changed so projects will remain over budget and late to schedule. We study a subject to death - but fail to implement the recommendations. Nothing but acts of frustration! And increased, unwarranted costs.

Tue, Jan 20, 2009 Shadan Malik Troy, Michigan

It is exciting that the chief performance officer (CPO) position, which has been around in one form or another since the Reagan-era, has evolved into a role expressly structured to evaluate performance in terms of wasted funds and budget expenses.

Because the government is structured like a large corporation, it must be treated as such for it to run efficiently. Deploying business intelligence (BI) strategies designed to identify performance gaps and issues will assist the “Budget Watchdogs” in distinguishing where the fat must be cut and what is working properly.

It is understandable that people are skeptical about the introduction of a CPO. It sounds like more of the same from the bureaucrats: transparency, accountability, etc. However, it is important to understand the power of BI technology and its ability to monitor the health of an organization.

Utilized by U.S. and international government agencies and contractors, BI applications translate the data that is gathered and stored into actionable insight. For example, one defense contractor employs BI technology to audit the status of its warehousing, inventory, and shipments to meet service level agreements. Other agencies will it find useful for cost-control, compliance with regulations, financial budgeting, planning, and tracking of grants.

Thu, Jan 8, 2009 Feddie

Great! Just what we need, another layer of micro managers. Enterprise-level productivity = no productivity. Believe me, I'm in the middle of it.

Thu, Jan 8, 2009 Debbie christopher.beatty@ci.irs.gov

Look where she worked at before. It's towards the bottom

Thu, Jan 8, 2009

I've worked for the Federal Government almost 20 yrs at different agencies and I've noticed two common issues. 1) Under staffed. 2) Lack of accountability. In spite of formal training and-on-the-job, training made available, there are just a lot of lazy people working in the federal government and there is no way to get rid of them. The private sectors are able to issue "pink slips" without a threat of an EO complaint/lawsuit. The Federal solution/trend is to promote them or give "glorifying recommendations" to other agencies just to get them out of the way. I'm not holding my breath that there will be a major change before I retire.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above
John Monroe

FCW Insider

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.

eSeminar

  • Telework at OPM: The responsibilities and the benefits

    Federal Computer Week will present the Office of Personnel Management’s Dan Green, Marie L’Etoile and Dr. Kim Wells in an eSeminar at 2 p.m. Wednesday, July 29, where they will discuss the implications telework has for businesses, agencies and employees. Read more

Current issue of FCW