Search FCW


Subscribe Now!
Table of Contents
Sprint
Business
BPM
CXOs
Columns
Columnists
Defense
E-Government
Elections 2008
Enterprise Architecture
Funding
Homeland Security
Health IT
IPv6
LOB
Management
Procurement
Privacy
Policy
Program Management
State and Local
Security
Technology
Telework
Training and Certification
Workforce

More Topics
resourcecenter
Home
Letters to the Editor
Current Issue/Download
Print/Online Archives
Editorial Calendar
researchstore
resourcecenter
Communications for Continuity Operations

Oracle Resource Center
NEW - Air Force ELSG Contract Guide
NEW - Security Management
NEW - DOD and Security Guide
Networx Contract Guide
SEWP IV Contract Guide
Priority Report: Virtualization
NEW - CHESS formerly ASCP
New - SATCOM II

More >>



Latest News
ADVERTISEMENT





 

Agencies struggle to defend IT spending

By Matthew Weigelt
Published on October 17, 2006

Comment

Click here to comment on this article


Related story links

Report from President's Management Council

E-gov scores stabilize

Congress blamed for poor e-gov performance


Newsletters

You might also be interested in these FCW newsletters:

Daily

To learn more, click here.


Most departments and agencies can justify a majority of their information technology investments, but the departments of Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs and the Army Corps of Engineers could defend less than half of their investments, according to a report released Oct. 13. Seven departments and agencies justified more than 50 percent of their investments, and 15 validated all of their investments, according to the report, “Giving the American People More for Their Money.” The report states that DHS has $4.16 billion for IT in the fiscal 2007 budget, the VA has $1.9 billion and the Army Corps of Engineers has $375 million. The President’s Management Council issued the report, which focused on the 2006 results from the President’s Management Agenda. Departments must support IT investments with sound justifications based on acceptable criteria such as risk management, security and project management. They also have cost, schedule and performance goals, which measure project performance, called earned value management. EVM compares a work’s planned value with what was accomplished. Metrics and data for cost, schedule and performance variance were unavailable for DHS, the VA and the Army Corps of Engineers, the report states. Among the 25 departments and agencies reviewed, 10 varied less than 10 percent on EVM for IT investments and 12 varied less than 30 percent. “It’s important to measure results so that we know we’re doing our job,” President Bush said Oct. 13 at a meeting with the council to discuss the management agenda. “It’s also important to measure results to determine whether or not the taxpayers’ money is being spent wisely.”

upcoming event

Enterprise Architecture 2008 - Washington, DC
September 9 - September 10, 2008

Occupational Health & Safety Executive Summit - Arlington, VA
October 6 - October 7, 2008


 

head
fcw
issue
First Name State
Last Name Zip
Title Email