Editorial: Competition matters

After years of quiet passivity, it is refreshing to see strong leadership from the General Services Administration. That being said, GSA’s attempt to bring more contracts under its purview is misguided.

GSA Administrator Lurita Doan said she would like the agency to oversee NASA’s Scientific and Engineering Workstation Procurement (SEWP) governmentwide acquisition contract program — and one would expect that GSA would want to control most governmentwide contracts. There are two problems with that plan.

First, GSA needs to fix its own shop before the agency will be ready to control other contracts. Doan has made impressive steps toward making GSA once again the pre-eminent procurement organization in the federal government, and there is a palpable sense that GSA is improving, but the agency is not yet fixed.

By contrast, SEWP has been doing impressive business, garnering loyalty from those who use the contracts and the SEWP vendors.

Doan makes a fair point that most agencies should focus on their core missions, not procurement and contracting. By contrast, governmentwide contracting is GSA’s mission. Yet while Doan argues that “GSA is the premier location for procurement,” GSA has to convince its customers.

But there is a more important question — should all contracts be kept together? We don’t think so.

One of the tenets of the procurement reforms instituted in the past decade has been competition — competition at almost every phase of the buying process, including competition among contracts.

Having one organization manage all governmentwide contracts may seem to be efficient, but it ignores the benefits that result from competition. GSA is on a better path, but it is on that path as a result of competition. Agencies started looking at other governmentwide contracts — or they created their own contracts — when GSA was no longer addressing those needs and became too expensive.

Rather than asking to take over other contracts, GSA should look to provide superior service. GSA has a real opportunity to prove itself, but that should be through competition, not as the result of a policy decision.

cartoon

About the Author

Christopher J. Dorobek is the co-anchor of Federal News Radio’s afternoon drive program, The Daily Debrief with Chris Dorobek and Amy Morris, and the founder, publisher and editor of the DorobekInsider.com, a leading blog for the Federal IT community.

Dorobek joined Federal News Radio in 2008 with 16 years of experience covering government issues with an emphasis on government information technology. Prior to joining Federal News Radio, Dorobek was editor-in-chief of Federal Computer Week, the leading news magazine for government IT decision-makers and the flagship of the 1105 Government Information Group portfolio of publications. As editor-in-chief, Dorobek served as a member of the senior leadership team at 1105 Government Information Group, providing daily editorial direction and management for FCW magazine, FCW.com, Government Health IT and its other editorial products.

Dorobek joined FCW in 2001 as a senior reporter and assumed increasing responsibilities, becoming managing editor and executive editor before being named editor-in-chief in 2006. Prior to joining FCW, Dorobek was a technology reporter at PlanetGov.com, one of the first online community centers for current and former government employees. He also spent five years at Government Computer News, another leading industry publication, covering a variety of federal IT-related issues.

Dorobek is a frequent speaker on issues involving the government IT industry, and has appeared as a frequent contributor to NewsChannel 8’s Federal News Today program. He began his career as a reporter at the Foster’s Daily Democrat, a daily newspaper in Dover, N.H. He is a graduate of the University of Southern California. He lives in Washington, DC.


Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above