OMB lifts the veil on IT worries

Agency reveals two lists of projects that it says warrant expanded public oversight

The Office of Management and Budget is giving oversight and watchdog groups easy access to a wealth of data about major information technology projects across government.

Last week, OMB posted online the Management Watch List and High Risk List, which OMB officials use to monitor the planning and performance of key projects. The Management Watch List includes projects for which agencies have submitted business cases with apparent weaknesses. The High Risk List identifies projects that need special attention from the agencies’ senior executives in the course of their execution.

The bigger projects on those lists often are of equal interest to oversight groups, such as congressional committees and the Government Accountability Office. The documents should help them do a better job of tracking the progress of big-ticket programs — and OMB’s oversight of them.

That is what GAO had in mind earlier this month when it recommended that OMB share the lists with Congress. With those documents in hand, Congress and GAO can collaborate with OMB in overseeing troubled projects, said David Powner, GAO’s director of IT management issues.

“It’s hard to stay on top of 900 projects,” Powner said.

Agencies could notice the difference, observers said.

Publicizing the two lists puts pressure on agencies to fix projects that are performing poorly because it puts them under the microscope, said Renee Courtland, a former OMB official and now a senior associate at Dutko Government Markets.

“Some large departments have a bad habit of thumbing their nose at criticism that originates from the management side of OMB,” she said. “If this report generates enough negative attention from congressional appropriators, even those agencies will sit up and pay attention.”

David McClure, former vice president of e-government at the Council for Excellence in Government and now a research director at Gartner, said congressional appropriators can use the lists to ask agencies more carefully honed questions.

However, the lists lack OMB’s project analyses, which would have provided more clarity about why a given project made the list, he said.

Under the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996, agencies must submit business plans for IT investments to OMB. If an agency’s investment plan contains weaknesses, OMB puts it on the watch list and targets it for follow-up action.

Last year OMB had 263 investments on the watch list. Now there are 86, representing a savings of more than $5 billion, according to OMB.

Several experts said OMB has resisted sharing its Management Watch List because it is closely linked with budget formulation. OMB has been more willing to hand over its High Risk List.

In August 2005, OMB established its High Risk List for IT projects to ensure that agencies and programs were meeting their intended goals and producing results.

“If you are on the High Risk List, it does not mean that the project is at risk,” said Karen Evans, OMB’s administrator for e-government and IT, speaking Sept. 21 at a luncheon.

The designation merely means the projects need extra attention, which can be because of their costs or their importance, she said. She cited the transition to IPv6 as an example of a project that warrants placement on the list because of its importance.

In fiscal 2007, the federal government will spend about $64 billion on IT projects. Some observers are hopeful the lists will affect government spending priorities. “Any small step toward transparency can change the culture of spending in Washington,” said John Hart, spokesman for Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.).

OMB’s decision to release the lists came a week after Congress sent a transparency bill to the White House. The bill would require OMB to build a searchable database of organizations that receive federal funding. The president expressed his support for the legislation and is expected to sign it into law this week.

columnist top

The 2015 Federal 100

Meet 100 women and men who are doing great things in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image (by venimo): e-learning concept image, digital content and online webinar icons.

    Can MOOCs make the grade for federal training?

    Massive open online courses can offer specialized IT instruction on a flexible schedule and on the cheap. That may not always mesh with government's preference for structure and certification, however.

  • Shutterstock image (by edel): graduation cap and diploma.

    Cybersecurity: 6 schools with the right stuff

    The federal government craves more cybersecurity professionals. These six schools are helping meet that demand.

  • Rick Holgate

    Holgate to depart ATF

    Former ACT president will take a job with Gartner, follow his spouse to Vienna, Austria.

  • Are VA techies slacking off on Yammer?

    A new IG report cites security and productivity concerns associated with employees' use of the popular online collaboration tool.

  • Shutterstock image: digital fingerprint, cyber crime.

    Exclusive: The OPM breach details you haven't seen

    An official timeline of the Office of Personnel Management breach obtained by FCW pinpoints the hackers’ calibrated extraction of data, and the government's step-by-step response.

  • Stephen Warren

    Deputy CIO Warren exits VA

    The onetime acting CIO at Veterans Affairs will be taking over CIO duties at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

  • Shutterstock image: monitoring factors of healthcare.

    DOD awards massive health records contract

    Leidos, Accenture and Cerner pull off an unexpected win of the multi-billion-dollar Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization contract, beating out the presumptive health-records leader.

  • Sweating the OPM data breach -- Illustration by Dragutin Cvijanovic

    Sweating the stolen data

    Millions of background-check records were compromised, OPM now says. Here's the jaw-dropping range of personal data that was exposed.

  • FCW magazine

    Let's talk about Alliant 2

    The General Services Administration is going to great lengths to gather feedback on its IT services GWAC. Will it make for a better acquisition vehicle?

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above