Doan campaigns against SEWP

GSA is one of the GWAC’s prime customers, but Doan says NASA should let it end

The General Services Administration is one of the biggest users of NASA’s Scientific and Engineering Workstation Procurement III contract, even though GSA Administrator Lurita Doan argues that the contract unnecessarily duplicates what GSA should be doing.

Asked recently whether SEWP provides useful competition for other contracts, Doan said, “If you think that’s competition, then you have totally misunderstood what competition is about.” In fiscal 2005, GSA spent $476.5 million through SEWP III. That put GSA second only to the Defense Department, which spent $507 million, according to an internal report on the contract’s performance obtained by Federal Computer Week.

Overall, SEWP III did $3.5 billion in business in fiscal 2005, a 10 percent increase over the amount of business reported in fiscal 2004, the report states. NASA expects SEWP’s fiscal 2007 business to rise another 10 percent, according to the report.

Doan said GSA should be the agency that handles procurement, while NASA should “focus on the truly grand mission of getting another guy on the moon or going out to space or getting our Hubble [Space] Telescope to work again,” she said. “These are important things for our morale and our spirit as Americans.”

Earlier this year, Doan began campaigning to take SEWP away from NASA, arguing that GSA is the logical choice for governmentwide acquisition contracts that feature commodity products and services. Doan said she believes SEWP III and similar agency-run contracts duplicate GSA’s business.

Doan said she has asked the Office of Federal Procurement Policy to deny NASA’s request to start work on SEWP IV. OFPP Administrator Paul Denett has requested additional information from NASA, according to Doan.

“I do think he wants to make a judicious decision,” Doan said Sept. 27 while meeting with reporters after speaking at a National Chamber Foundation business forum. “To me, there is only one decision, so my life is very simple.”

Federal Acquisition Service Commissioner Jim Williams said the changes GSA has proposed would be in the best interests of NASA and the public.

SEWP under review
“While GSA values the current partnership with NASA on SEWP III, we believe for the overall efficiency of government procurement, all of those customer agencies’ needs anticipated to be met by SEWP IV can be met by GSA contractors, with savings to the taxpayers,” Williams said. Dean Acosta, NASA’s press secretary, said the space agency would not discuss the situation or Doan’s comments while OFPP is considering the contract’s future.

However, some market observers say the government benefits from the competition created by overlapping contracts.

“It’s not duplication,” despite Doan’s characterization, said Skip Kemerer, a contract officer and deputy program manager for SEWP from 1992 to 1997. “It’s competition to GSA, and that is necessary to keep GSA competitive in the fees it charges and the services it provides.”

Competition or duplication?
Stan Soloway, president of the Professional Services Council, said Doan is raising an important issue about the roles of different contract vehicles in the federal marketplace.

Doan’s position introduces “a question of balance and alignment, and it’s probably less a question of either/or,” Soloway said.

The debate should lead to a clearer distinction between necessary replication and unneeded duplication of effort, he said.

DOD and GSA are the leading SEWP contract usersBusiness for NASA’s Scientific and Engineering Workstation Procurement III governmentwide acquisition contract grew by 10 percent over SEWP II levels, according to a government report on fiscal 2005 GWAC activity.

The Defense Department was the top user. It spent $507 million and topped the second biggest customer — the General Services Administration — by more than $30 million, according to the report. GSA spent $476.5 million with 3,350 task orders.

The Navy Department ranked third at $465.8 million, more than $10 million behind GSA. The Air Force, the next largest user, was more than $131 million behind GSA.

Overall, SEWP III brought in 59,896 task orders with a total value of $3.5 billion, according to the report. SEWP II brought in $2.3 billion with 54,752 orders, the report states.

“This trend show a 10 percent increase in usage as well as a 14 percent increase in average order size,” the report states. “NASA projects that SEWP IV will be similar to SEWP III’s usage.”

Paul Denett, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, is considering whether to allow SEWP IV to go forward. GSA Administrator Lurita Doan has petitioned Denett not to allow the follow-on contract.

— Matthew Weigelt

Featured

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above