2008 Watch List: EVM for everyone

Office of Management and Budget mandate will propel EVM further into the mainstream

A mix of management to-do's

Here are four other management hot spots to watch in 2008.

Leadership programs

This year will mark the beginning of the transition to a new presidential administration in 2009.

Effective and continuous leadership is essential for a smooth transition, observers say.

“The challenge is that you wind up with turnover that is dislocating because current [programs] get stopped, and the new team has to come in and make progress on their own learning curve,” said Max Stier, president and chief executive officer of the Partnership for Public Service.

The Homeland Security Department, under the direction of Marta Perez, the departing chief human capital officer, has implemented a departmentwide integrated leadership program, with a transition plan and team that will carry the department through 2009 and beyond, DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff said.

Meanwhile, the Office of Personnel Management has restructured its Federal Candidate Development Program for preparing future agency leaders for the Senior Executive Service. OPM’s Federal Executive Institute will manage and deliver the curriculum.

Another leadership effort is under way at the Partnership for Public Service. Officials are developing a formal transition strategy to help the next administration hit the ground running.

“One of our hopes is to build on what’s been done smartly by this administration [and] to continue the things that need to be continued for the next 12 months,” Stier said. “This administration is being smart about focusing on continuity issues — how they identify career leadership that will carry on the work while the transition is happening.”

One of the advantages of a nonprofit leadership program is that it can offer long-term support.

“We can maintain that long-term focus that’s harder for individual leaders inside government to do,” Stier said.

— Richard W. Walker

Performance management

Agencies will be asked to become more accountable for their programs’ performance. A presidential executive order issued in November made agency leaders responsible for meeting program quality and efficiency goals and measuring progress toward those goals.

The executive order formalized the Program Assessment Rating Tool, which program managers use to measure how well they meet their mission objectives, and it put teeth in the Government Performance and Results Act. The order also required the Office of Management and Budget to establish a Performance Improvement Council of senior agency representatives to monitor and accelerate agencies’ progress.

— Mary Mosquera

Lean Six Sigma

Lean Six Sigma, a business process improvement methodology, is gaining adherents. The methodology helps program managers save on project costs and speed implementation. The Agriculture Department is using Lean Six Sigma to analyze and streamline its grants business processes and align them with OMB’s Grants Management Line of Business initiative.

But Lean Six Sigma is more than a short-term technique for program managers. “It should be a way of life,” an Army official said.

At the Defense Department, Lean Six Sigma is becoming just that. Officials at the Business Transformation Agency have taken steps to institutionalize the discipline departmentwide. The Naval Air Systems Command saved more than $1 million last year because of improvements in its contract closeout processes. At the same time, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service has used Lean Six Sigma to improve the operation of its employee benefits call center.

— Richard W. Walker

Telework

The General Services Administration expects to increase the number of eligible employees who telework at least one day per week to 20 percent by the end of 2008.

The benchmark is part of the agency’s ambitious plan to have 50 percent of eligible employees telecommuting once a week by 2010.

Currently, only 10 percent of eligible GSA employees do so regularly.

Lurita Doan, GSA’s administrator, said the agency will be launching an aggressive internal drive to overcome obstacles to telework, such as resistance from managers who worry that it will decrease employee productivity.

GSA is one of the agencies leading federal telework efforts. It operates 14 centers in the Washington metropolitan area where approved employees can use government-issued computers to work when they are away from the office.

— Ben Bain

Once an obscure project-management tool used mostly by Defense Department agencies, earned value management is making its way into mainstream program oversight. That trend will continue this year.

There is little doubt that EVM is becoming tightly woven into the management fabric at government agencies. A recent report from the Congressional Research Service concluded that EVM is of “increasing salience” in government project management practices.

The management technique measures progress against cost, schedule and performance baselines, and it is designed to raise red flags when a project is in trouble. At its simplest, it lets managers identify a problem early and take corrective action.

“The easiest way I explain it, especially to senior managers, is that EVM measures your actual performance against your planned activity,” said Karen Evans, administrator of e-government and information technology at the Office of Management and Budget. “I think it really gets to the execution [of a project].

It’s about delivering results.”

OMB’s requirement that agencies adopt EVM has helped spread its use governmentwide.

Since 2004, OMB has required agencies to develop policies for using EVM to establish and validate performance measurement baselines against cost, schedule and performance goals.

Agencies must use the technique for major new IT projects, a policy aligned with the President’s Management Agenda. When OMB gives an agency a PMA score card rating, it takes into account whether the agency is using EVM to plan and manage its IT investments.

To receive a green score, a project cannot vary from its cost, schedule and performance benchmarks by more than 10 percent.

Without an OMB mandate for agencies to adopt EVM, its use would probably not be as widespread, said David McClure, a research director at Gartner’s Government Group. “That’s still the driver — getting compliance, showing that you are using EVM and that your contractors have EVM in place.”

OMB has no plans to alter its EVM policy this year. “I think the policy is fairly sound, and the criteria are very measurable,” Evans said, adding that most agencies are faring well on implementing EVM.

“Some agencies have been very aggressive and have implemented EVM above and beyond what’s required in the policy, and some agencies are still struggling with the basic [policy] requirements,” Evans said.

“OMB plans to work aggressively this year with noncompliant agencies to make sure they have a robust [EVM] policy in place,” she said. Officials will work through the CIO Council’s Best Practices Committee to share lessons learned with those agencies.

They will also help agencies work through high-risk projects so they can see the value of EVM, embrace it and take it agencywide, she added.

On the contractor side, companies are developing ways to include EVM in their project management procedures. EVM is destined to be the difference between winning and losing government contracts, officials at GTSI said.

EVM could also be a useful congressional oversight tool, according to the Congressional Research Service report.

Clinton Bass, an analyst of government organization and management at CRS’ Government and Finance Division, wrote in the report that metrics generated by EVM are of growing value to Congress as lawmakers weigh decisions about the authorization and funding of capital projects.

Karen Richey, senior cost analyst at the Government Accountability Office’s Center for Technology and Engineering, said her group has used EVM for audits published in more than 20 GAO reports since 2003.

“We definitely view EVM as a wonderful oversight tool for our audits” she said.

EVM can show the status of a major capita l investment as a snapshot in time, Bass said. “The story that EVM tells can be a significant one,” he added. “Once the basic jargon and concepts are understood, EVM provides a visually simple picture on a periodic basis of whether or not a project is on track with plans. For oversight purposes, EVM can thereby flag outliers and signal the potential need to ask further questions.”

However, Bass said EVM doesn’t necessarily tell the whole story. Without further evaluation of a project, “EVM metrics might tell only a partial story,” he wrote.

“For example, even when EVM metrics are accurately captured and portrayed, the metrics typically will not reveal why a project might be experiencing schedule or cost variances.”

Furthermore, EVM data might not accurately represent the cost and schedule that are most conducive to a project achieving a particular functionality, Bass wrote.

Evans agreed that EVM is not a panacea.

“This is just one of many tools that the CIO needs to have to be able to manage the portfolio,” she said. “It’s a nice, standardized, quantitative way for agencies to demonstrate that they’re performing. But you’ve got to use it with other tools.”  

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above