What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Lieberman creates contracting oversight panel

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, has created a subcommittee to oversee federal contracting. Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) will be its chairwoman.

Contract management “is a problem area that needs as much oversight as we can possibly muster,” Lieberman said Jan. 28 as he created the Ad Hoc Contracting Oversight Subcommittee.

Lieberman’s committee has had a longstanding interest in reducing mismanagement and abuse in contracting. The committee has held numerous hearings on contracting problems within the Homeland Security Department, waste in Iraq and Afghanistan reconstruction programs, and problems created by private contractors in war zones. It has also investigated the rapid increase governmentwide in contracting for goods and services.

McCaskill has unique investigative experience and has already pushed contracting reforms in the previous Congress, Lieberman said. Some of her reforms were included in the fiscal 2009 National Defense Authorization Act (S. 3001). Lieberman added that McCaskill will approach the subcommittee work with unmatched vigor.

“Last year we made major strides in contracting accountability by establishing the Wartime Contracting Commission, and while I look forward to those investigations, we all know that outrageous contracting abuses occur in every facet of government,” McCaskill said. “I can't wait to get to work saving huge money for taxpayers. They deserve it.”

Contracting, particularly concerning practices at the Defense Department and NASA, has remained on the Government Accountability Office’s High-Risk list for 17 years and 19 years, respectively. On the 2009 High Risk List, GAO continues to conclude that government contracting is susceptible to abuse and needs comprehensive reform because agencies often mismanage their contracts.

Despite the potential for problems, the government today relies heavily on contractors. DOD obligated more than $315 billion on contracts for goods and services in fiscal 2007, which is more than double the amount it spent six years ago, according to GAO.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a senior writer covering acquisition and procurement for Federal Computer Week. Follow him on Twitter: @matthewweigelt.

Reader comments

Thu, Feb 5, 2009 Adrian Arnold Alexandria

Try fixing the long hiring process and low pay and you may get some of the Contracting people in place. Some of the other suggestions are on point but without the people on the Gov side all the other fixes are "fixed"!

Wed, Feb 4, 2009 S Small

Contract oversight is one of many problems in acquisitions. Hiring sufficient personnel to administer contracts would help, but the core of the problem in cost overruns is in requirements development. Major program acquisitions (i.e.DoD weapons systems) take many years and have multiple military Program Manager who rotate to other positions (after making their "mark" on the program for evaluation purposes). There is no continuity of experience and the time to get up to speed impacts cost, schedule, and performance. Therefore, you will "always" have this problem, unless the way programs are managed changes.

Wed, Feb 4, 2009

The solution to the contracting problems isn't more oversight - it's the ability to hire and attract more qualified people and keep them. Too many contracts and not enough contracting personnel to administer them and provide proper oversight. And the contracting personnel needs proper and adequate training so they can properly perform their duties.

Wed, Feb 4, 2009

Most of the problems are caused by guess who -- Congress. FAR and DFARs are phonebooks of dos and donts and timetables that staggers the mind. 24 months for an ACAT1 program and that's if it doesn't get protested. If so, add a yesr. And congress insists on annual budgets. DOD puts in a two year plan, but it's a joke. As to requirements, there you have a point. As we award to the Boeings and Lockheed Martins our requirements get fuzzier. Capability definition has either failed us or not been properly implemented. We continue to get the wrong product late and over budget. More trained people may help, but if the core system is rotten it won't.

Tue, Feb 3, 2009

And who generally does the survey's and oversight? Contractors! The last point in the article is the heart of it - "...agencies often mismanage their contracts." Enormous large contracts to costly contractors monopolize productive development and the accomplishment of mission goals for ease of procurement...

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Desktop Virtualization: Better Management with Smaller Budgets Register Now

    This webcast will explore the benefits of desktop virtualization, and how the innovative technology can help agencies lower the cost of their IT infrastructure, improve end-user performance, while enabling a mobile workforce. A government expert will share real-life case studies of leveraging desktop virtualization solutions to enable secure telework policies, organization-wide IT infrastructure standards and extend the life of current hardware assets - Register Now!! Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.