What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

E-Verify dropped from stimulus bill

The updated $789 billion economic stimulus package going to the House and Senate for votes today does not require E-Verify employment verification for contracts created with stimulus funding.

House and Senate conference negotiators dropped the E-Verify provisions in the 1,073-page final version of the legislation circulating today. Previously, the House had included in its stimulus bill a stipulation that all contracts paid for with stimulus funding must use E-Verify, but the Senate version had no E-Verify language.

E-Verify is an Internet-based program promoted by the Bush administration to allow employers to submit Social Security numbers for new hires and existing employees. If there is a match, the employee is eligible to work. If not, there are procedures for further assessments.

Currently, about 100,000 employers voluntarily use E-Verify, formerly known as Basic Pilot. Under an executive order issued by President George W. Bush, federal contractors are supposed to start using E-Verify in May, though business groups are challenging the order in court.

Critics point to relatively high error rates in the government databases used to determine initial eligibility. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which jointly runs the program with the Social Security Administration, estimates that about 4,000 U.S. workers in every 1 million would be initially denied eligibility because of the database errors.

Groups such as the Immigration Policy Center refer to E-Verify as “deeply flawed” because of the error rates and have warned of the danger of American workers losing or risking their jobs because of the shortcomings in E-Verify. They also said E-Verify would slow the impact of the stimulus spending.

On the other side, E-Verify supporters including the Federation for American Immigration Reform consider it to be a useful tool to protect jobs in the United States from going to illegal immigrants.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer for Federal Computer Week.

Reader comments

Thu, Feb 19, 2009

INITIALLY denied. I'm guessing that those INITIALLY denied will consist of two types of people. The first will be illegal aliens or other criminals using someone else's SS#. The second group is the people whose SS# has been stolen. It will take less than 48 hr. to clear up status of the second group. It should take a call to ICE and a few minutes to arrest those in the first group.

Wed, Feb 18, 2009 Texas

On August 18, 1982, Lone Star Steel (located in my hometown Lone Star, Texas) shut the plant and laid off 3500 steelworkers. On that same day, Congress granted amnesty to some 6 million illegal aliens who entered the United States before January 1, 1980. Migrants who entered before January 1, 1978 would become permanent residents. Those entering between then and 1980 would be temporary residents eligible for permanent status after a 3-year wait. On the same day in 1982, Mexico negotitated for a $4.1 billion credit line from the International Monetary Fund in a desperate effort to head off default on it $80 billion foreign debt. Source Dallas Morning News August 18, 1982 The Morris County, TX (Lone Star is located in Morris County) unemployment rate in 1983 was 24.6%. E-verify was taken out of the stimulus package. Because of that, look for employers and contractors receiving stimulus money for infrastructure projects to hire illegal aliens with your taxpayer dollar. http://fcw.com/articles/2009/02/13/everify-dropped.aspx And last week, US Steel, formerly known as Lone Star Steel, announced a production stoppage that will layoff 1200 workers. http://www.news-journal.com/news/content/news/stories/2009/02/12/02122009_US_Steel_cuts.html Yes, history is about to repeat itself.

Tue, Feb 17, 2009 DoDGoV

"Social Security Administration, estimates that about 4,000 U.S. workers in every 1 million would be initially denied eligibility because of the database errors." If those estimates are accurate, the projected error rate would be .004 or four tenths of one percent. With E-Verify actually being a fairly new program, and consistantly being monitored and updated, just how many other new programs we all deal with on a daily basis, have such a minimal error rate of .004?

Tue, Feb 17, 2009

The article is mediocre and misleading by attempting to conceal the genesis of the deletion of E-Verify by omitting the very significant adjective "Democrat" before "House & Senate Negotiators." The non-transparent/ closed-door "DEMOCRAT House & Senate Negotiators" --not a transparent bipartisan group of "House & Senate Negotiators" killed the E-Verify provision (which had been passed in the House with bipartisan support). What a shameful lack of integrity in the reporting in this article !!

Tue, Feb 17, 2009 Cincolaters

E-Verify is not a pre-screening tool for hiring people. That is, in fact, illegal. It can only be used AFTER someone is hired. If they turn out to be undocumented - then the employer has a helluva case in firing that employer .. because you run into privacy issues, etc. E-Verify is essentially a tool for businesses to use to ensure protection from ICE and the general public if they choose to hire undocumented workers. It just has a pretty and shiny gloss on it that tells another story. You know ... spin. Check out my honest comments on Rep. Lamar Smith's piece in the washington times if you want the whole story.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

eSeminar

  • Where Cyberwarfare and Cybersecurity Meet

    We invite you to attend the third event in this three-part series on Cybersecurity. 1105 Government Information Group will present a panel of government and cybersecurity experts including Gregory T. Garcia, the nation's first presidentially-appointed Assistant Secretary for CyberSecurity and Communications with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2006-2008; and Jeffrey Carr, cyber strategies consultant and author of Inside Cyber Warfare, in this editorial webcast on Tuesday, April 13 at 11 a.m., where they will discuss the cyberwarfare threat to both industry and government, as well as strategies to consolidate the wider cybersecurity mission. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.

Highlights from the current issue