What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Official: FAA shows progress on NextGen

The Federal Aviation Administration has advanced its Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen), which would improve management of traffic with automated computer and satellite systems, a senior FAA senior official has said.

Under NextGen, the FAA said it is transforming its ground-based air traffic control system to a satellite-based system, named the Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B), which would let airline pilots have the capability to take on more of their own air traffic activities.

“Air traffic controllers would eventually manage airline traffic more than control it,” Vicki Cox, the FAA's senior vice president of NextGen and operations planning, said March 4 at an industry event sponsored by IAC.

The agency has begun to deploy ADS-B, first in Alaska, and UPS voluntarily equipped 107 of its aircraft with the technology. Pilots flying aircraft equipped with ADS-B technology in South Florida can now receive air traffic and weather information on their cockpit displays, she said.

“This is the first time that pilots are able to see the same traffic information as air traffic controllers,” she said. The outcome from using ADS-B in South Florida “paves the way for a national implementation of ADS-B,” she added.

By October, the FAA will have ADS-B capability over the Gulf of Mexico. The agency, in partnership with the Helicopter Association International, is installing ADS-B ground stations on oil rigs in the gulf.


About the Author

Mary Mosquera is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

Reader comments

Fri, Mar 13, 2009 planetalker Huntsville, AL

"...which would let airline pilots have the capability to take on more of their own air traffic activities."
What about non-airline pilots? GA, Corporate, Charter? How do they fit in?




Thu, Mar 12, 2009 Karl Long Island, NY

ADS-B has great potential but the cost needs to be kept to something resonable for the average GA pilot. A hand held GPS for home goes for $50 and one for the airplane is $1500. Panel mount it and you add another zero+. If ADS-B follows suite it will be a problem.

Wed, Mar 11, 2009 Bill Kingwood, TX.

Ctsig has pointed to a cockpit problem that is never mentioned in all the writings about NextGen smd that is "Cockpit Displays."In 1973 NAS Stage A it was determined that a 21 inch display mounted at a 30 degree angle at desktop hight was the ergonomiccly correct position for a controller to see everything at a glance. Now he has a Plasma display plus another display for flight inforation.Will this fit in the cockpit. With data link the pilot will also now be confronted with a keyboard. This will all be a moot point because runway capacity has been a growing problem since I retired 30 years ago. The existing NAS system has had the capability of overloading the Airport system on any given day. Remember there has only been 6 or 7 large airports built in this country since WWII.Maybe ATA and ALPA should think twice about what they are asking for.

Wed, Mar 11, 2009

ADS-B sounds like a really good idea. I think having access to traffic info and wx is very helpful. But I temper my enthusiasim with a healthy skeptisism. Will the technology really deliver the results the FAA touts? Will it's cost be such that GA pilots can afford it? Will we as an aviation community, in fact, have a better system than now? My skeptisisim is fostered by what happened to the FSS system.We got promised alot, but the reality is, it is no where near as good as what we had. Any of you pilots out there think you get better service now? I think the jury is still out on what ADS-B will do.-Flight Liner

Tue, Mar 10, 2009 TrainRider USA

Craig, I am all for flight crews having every bit of information available. I've been an En Route controller for almost 25 years, all "on the boards", not hiding in an office. I have seen and heard all kinds of ways that aircraft would seperate themselves and none have come close to working. Who is going to accept responsiblity when two planes get together. I see aircraft every day making non-standard turns, climbs and descents. Aircraft that are off course by several miles. Ask any flight crew how unmanaged traffic is when weather forces every aircraft to deviate through a single hole and Traffic Management has been around for years. If the FAA tries to keep planes on the ground guess what, the airline representatives call and bitch to get them in the air so they won't be hit with delays. Letting aircraft go where they want would be like taking the lines off of the streets, have you ever driven in Kingston, Jamaica? If so you can imagine what I am talking about. They can call it "managing" traffic all they want but the reality is they will still be "controlled" for years to come.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Service Consolidation: How to Avoid Basic Pitfalls of Shared Services Register Now

    This is the first webcast of the Series “Future First: Three Steps to Data Center Transformation”. Plan to attend this webcast to support your agency efforts to design a practical roadmap for consolidation of resources and shared services to meet current and emerging program demands. Learn from those who are doing to help you evaluate services in your current operations that may lend themselves to future shared service arrangements. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.