What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Acquisition experts create new institute

 Several federal acquisition experts have formed the nonprofit Federal Acquisition Innovation and Reform Institute (FAIR) to help the government generate policy ideas and more productive spending techniques, the new organization announced today.

“Our goal is to bring innovative solutions based on commercial and federal best practices that are practical for the complex federal environment,” said Raj Sharma, FAIR’s president and co-chairman of the board. Sharma is also president and chief executive officer of Censeo Consulting Group.

The institute said it intends to stress that acquisition reforms to be as comprehensive as possible by elevating the current discussion from procurement tactics, such as what types of contracts to use, to a more strategic debate aimed at what's required of a world-class acquisition system, Sharma said. The institute described itself as an important link between acquisition policy and execution.

With Sharma, Allan Burman, president of Jefferson Solutions, is the co-chairman of FAIR’s board.

Other current board members are:

  • David Nelson, chief supply chain and strategy officer for HTC Global Services.
  • Joe Sandor, professor of supply management at Michigan State University.
  • David Litman, former senior procurement executive at the Transportation Department.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is acquisition editor for Federal Computer Week.

Reader comments

Thu, Apr 23, 2009 Mike S.

Oh Joy! Just what I need another panel to tell me how to do my job as a contract specialist! Having returned to federal service after 17+ years in DoD followed by 15 years of working in the private sector with Government contracts, all we seem to do is Monday Morning Quarterback the process. Does the average supply chain manager in the private sector deal with congressional inquiries, GAO and Agency audits, protests, disputes, mandatory training and refresher training, earmarks, mandatory small business goals, etc., etc., etc. ? We have too much regulation in federal procurement from laws passed by the same Congressional leaders who criticize those of us working 10+ hours a day to support the federal procurement mission. We promote people too early based on college degrees and other formal training instead of measuring technical competencies as a Contract Specialist or Contract Officer. I have met folks who are GS-12s that back in my days in the military would not have earned a GS-7 in my office. I worked for civilians in DoD in the late 1970s who had high school degrees but they were excellent Contracting Officers! Why? They applied basic contracting 101 principles taught to them in a military technical school in procurement. The problem with federal contracting today can be tied to two areas-- poor leadership & management at both program and procurement lvels and a lack of effective mentoring in teaching contracts professionals how to effectively and efficiently perform their jobs!

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

eSeminar

  • The Top 100 Government Contractors NickWakeman_60

    Washington Technology Editor in Chief Nick Wakeman hosted an eSeminar, highlighting the magazine’s 17th annual Top 100 issue and the fears and hopes driving today’s market. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.