What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Obama scores high marks on transparency, watchdog group says

President Obama has made “tremendous progress” in increasing government transparency in his first 100 days in office but still has work to do in making more information available to the public, according to an assessment from a watchdog group.

The president has satisfied three out of five specific transparency goals for the first 100 days that were recommended by OMB Watch and 300 other individuals and advocacy groups in November 2008, according to an April 29 report from OMB Watch. The remaining two recommendations were partially satisfied.

The coalition’s agenda included five specific recommendations for the president’s first 100 days, and 70 recommendations overall, for making the federal government more open and accessible.

“President Obama has made transparency a high priority and has started significant efforts in what will be a long process of getting government to be more open,” OMB Watch said in the nine-page report. “On the specific recommendations for the first 100 days from the 'Moving Toward a 21st Century Right‐to‐Know Agenda' report, the administration has made tremendous progress.”

However, there are still many areas of unfinished business. The administration has announced plans to launch Data.gov to make various federal databases accessible but so far has provided few details on the project, the report said.

In addition, transparency advocates are still waiting to learn what types of discussions are being held, or have been held, to develop an Open Government Directive by mid-May, as Obama promised when he issued a directive on the Freedom of Information Act on his first day in office.

“In fact, there has been no formal public process to discuss the directive, creating concern that public access topics might be developed without public input, defying the very principles that the Obama memo called for,” OMB Watch wrote.

Obama has not yet made clear progress on the handling of Controlled Unclassified Information; nor has there been a change in vice presidential disclosure requirements, the report said. Also, the administration has not created a position of government transparency officer, though several officials, including Chief Technology Officer Aneesh Chopra, have been assigned transparency responsibilities, OMB Watch said.

Obama administration officials' decision to maintain Bush administration interpretations of executive branch power on the question of state secrets is also blocking progress, the report said.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week. Follow her on Twitter: @AliceLipowicz.

Reader comments

Mon, May 11, 2009

Wow, a lot of disgruntal people on this site, they seemed to be all bent out of shape about the Bush Administration while our country turns to socialism as the answer. Yes, it wasn't right for the Bush Admin to rack up debt during his 8 years, but Obama's answer is to quadruple that debt to outdue the Bush admin? I think these guys never paid attention in third grade math class and we are all going to pay the price one day. One day, we are not even going to have enough money to purchase the ink at the government printing press because we are making some much new money. It will be like the Weimer Republic in Germany in the 1930's when you needed a wheel barrel full of cash to purchase one loaf of bread. Ya, excellent course were on, can't wait until the Titantic sinks...

Tue, May 5, 2009

The most NOT transparent in your lifetime? Were you just born this year? Where were you for the last eight years - talk about NOT transparent!

Tue, May 5, 2009

I beg to differ on "This administration is the most NOT transparent that I can remember in my lifetime. Where are they getting this?" We were closer to an 'Iron Curtain' during Bush 'the Dubbya's" administration. As in any republican administration, it's always been a cash cow of borrow and spend and don't bother to pay the debt, "We'll let the Democrats try to pay it back so that we can accuse them of being high-rollers on spending and big government". The Sweet Revenge came when Bush 'the Dubbya' came down on bended knee to bail-out AGI and the banks through the TARP funds (for once the Repubs had to start paying-off our debt on their watch. Then there was the war: We were going after Bin Laden. When that could not be won, the bushites decided to go after Hussein calling anyone opposing them 'Unamerican' and all because of a personal patsy recalling, "he nearly killed my daddy". Then, there's the dark side of Haliburton/Cheney and Sole Source procurement. They forced the Contract Officer to resign after she had been demoted to a GS-9 for refusing to sign-off on the Haliburton contract. No, there was more internalized secrecy on the verge of paranoia from the privileged blue-blood republicans. Don't know about you but I feel freer and hopeful in the goals that President Obama has set for this administration.

Tue, May 5, 2009 Stephen Buckley

FYI: The President did NOT give a due-date for creation of the "Open Government Directive". However, he did give a due-date of 120 days for "recommendations". So there IS time for the WH to collaborate with the interested public about how to improve public collaboration. http://tinyurl.com/dbpkgq

Tue, May 5, 2009 Vimla Mariwalla

Wow, the web site has been created! Can I see names of at least a couple of agencies that will share their data with the public? Will I be able to see what is automated in the IRS and other agencies and what is it that still gets calculated manually? Will I be able to see how many employees each agency has and what they produce? Will I be able to see how many millions of dollars belonging to the social security funds or the tax payers were spent by the Government on stuff unrelated to it? Will I know if the present Government has any plans to return that money to the fund it belonged to? Is the present government willing to bring about improvements when public comes up with questions or suggestions based on the published data? If yes, what will the procedures be to handle questions and/suggestions? If not, what purpose will the data serve?

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Service Consolidation: How to Avoid Basic Pitfalls of Shared Services Register Now

    This is the first webcast of the Series “Future First: Three Steps to Data Center Transformation”. Plan to attend this webcast to support your agency efforts to design a practical roadmap for consolidation of resources and shared services to meet current and emerging program demands. Learn from those who are doing to help you evaluate services in your current operations that may lend themselves to future shared service arrangements. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.