What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Senate tries to put competition rules on earmark spending

Rule would apply equally to Congress and the president

Spending under "earmarks" in the Defense Department’s fiscal 2010 appropriations bill would have to be awarded under full and open competition under an amendment passed by the Senate.

Spending directed specifically by Congress “that is intended for award to a for-profit entity shall be subject to acquisition regulations for full and open competition on the same basis as each spending item intended for a for-profit entity that is contained in the budget request of the president,” according to an amendment offered Oct. 6 by Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), chairman of the Appropriations Committee.

“This proposal applies the rules of the road equally to Congress and the president,” Inouye said. He added that, “It insures that all spending items that are funded in this bill, regardless of who proposed them, are subject to the same rules for competition.”

The amendment would allow for exemptions from the full-and-open competition in the case of pre-awarded contracts, small business set-aside contract, or for small procurements.

Inouye's amendment passed 71 to 21. The amendment refers to spending specifically in the fiscal 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 3326). The bill would provide more than $636 billion in new discretionary spending for DOD.

The Senate passed the measure by 93 to 7. The House passed its version of the bill July 30. The House’s version has a variation of Inouye’s amendment. The difference is Inouye’s exemptions for pre-awarded contracts and small businesses.

Differences in the two bill will have to be worked out in a conference committee.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a senior writer covering acquisition and procurement for Federal Computer Week. Follow him on Twitter: @matthewweigelt.

Reader comments

Thu, Oct 8, 2009 M Reston

Something good being done in Congress? Something that will hinder a routine practice that shuold be outlawed because it is corrupt? I must be missing something. For now, I remain impressed. Senator Inouye must want to retire with some dignity. Good for him. Good for the country.Keep up the good work!

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Service Consolidation: How to Avoid Basic Pitfalls of Shared Services Register Now

    This is the first webcast of the Series “Future First: Three Steps to Data Center Transformation”. Plan to attend this webcast to support your agency efforts to design a practical roadmap for consolidation of resources and shared services to meet current and emerging program demands. Learn from those who are doing to help you evaluate services in your current operations that may lend themselves to future shared service arrangements. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.