What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Agencies spent billions of stimulus money on noncompetitive contracts

Web listing of such contracts is not very user-friendly, says a transparency advocate

A chart on the updated Recovery.gov Web site shows that federal agencies have spent about $7.8 billion in economic stimulus law funding  on noncompetitive and non-fixed-price contracts. However, the 39-page list of those contracts falls short on user friendliness, a transparency advocate said.

The Recovery.gov Web site has been posting new information regularly since it was updated Oct. 1. New data was added today, including information on 369 loans, 5,232 contracts and 41,575 grants, according to a news release today from the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, which runs the Web site.

The Recovery.gov chart of noncompetitive and non-fixed-price contracts lists the contracts by agency, company name, date of award and award amount, as of Sept. 8. The $7.8 billion total is published at the bottom of the chart. A representative of the oversight board said it is dealing with transparency concerns. “Our goal is to make the information on Recovery.gov as user-friendly as possible, but given the massive amount of data involved, that process will take some time,” said Cheryl Arvidson, assistant director of communication for the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.

The board also published a job total to date — 30,383 jobs created or saved — although a note attached says that figure will be updated in 24 hours due to “obviously incorrect submissions” by two recipients.

The site also has a map for tracking spending by ZIP code, a list of states listing the most jobs created, and a list of the largest stimulus law contracts, among other features. Additional awards will be published Oct. 30.

Under the stimulus law, recipients of funding were urged to award competitive, fixed-price contracts as much as possible. They also were required to report noncompetitive, non-fixed-price contracts.

The list of such contracts posted on Recovery.gov includes several large Energy Department contracts, including $1.3 billion to Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC and $1 billion to CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation. National Cancer Institute contractor SAIC-Frederick received a $303 million award under the stimulus that was either noncompetitive or non-fixed-price as well, according to the list.

“While the site follows the letter of the law and has a special section for [noncompetitive and] non-fixed-price contracts, the implementation leaves much to be desired,” said Craig Jennings, senior federal fiscal policy analyst with OMB Watch. But for transparency’s sake, the list could have been designed better, Jennings said.

His chief concern is that the list of contracts is a PDF from which it is not possible to directly import data into an analysis application, such as Microsoft Excel.

Also, users cannot click on a specific contract and see details for that contract.

“By putting the data in a PDF, users can’t sort the list to look for, say, the largest non-fixed-price contract or filter the list to display only Energy Department contracts,” Jennings said.

There also is a lack of identifying information on the contractor, project or award that would allow users to look the contracts up in other federal systems such as USAspending.gov, he said.


Reader comments

Fri, Oct 16, 2009 Former Contracting Officer

Beat up on the contracting professionals again...no wonder I left that field.

Fri, Oct 16, 2009 Editor

EDITOR's NOTE: The information is available at Recovery.gov.

Fri, Oct 16, 2009 mafatrifo

Thank you for the article. Can you publish the website link? We would like to take a look at ourselves.

Fri, Oct 16, 2009 Mike McManus Wright-Patterson AFB

Gentlemen - "Full and Open, Fixed Price & Competative" and "Fast" are mutually exclusive terms in Government contracting. A full & open, fixed-price, competitive source selection requires 18 to 24 months of effort. We're talking about defining a requirement, conducting market research, getting command approval (through numerous layers) of the acquisition strategy, issueing the RFP, conducting the technical and cost analysis, making the source selection and more often than not these days, defending the source selection decision against the other offerors protest. As you can see not fast. Generally you can get something either good or fast, rarely can you get it good AND fast.

Fri, Oct 16, 2009 Peter G. Tuttle, CPCM

And we're surprised? IMHO, part of this problem was caused by the Administration's direction to speedily make awards on the pretext of getting money into the hands of the public, etc. When you place artificial time limitations on a process (I am talking about the federal procurement process) that ultimately was designed to be fair, based upon full and open competition, then you reap what you sow. Nobody should be surprised that problems of this nature occur. Now the GAO and agency OIG's will have field days beating up the procurement professionals who had their hands tied by their management and the Administration. It would be heartening to see responses to this article from agency procurement professionals that did the "right" thing the "right" way and still achieved the Administration's goal (whether we agree about the goal or not).

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

Editorial Webcasts

  • Service Consolidation: How to Avoid Basic Pitfalls of Shared Services Register Now

    This is the first webcast of the Series “Future First: Three Steps to Data Center Transformation”. Plan to attend this webcast to support your agency efforts to design a practical roadmap for consolidation of resources and shared services to meet current and emerging program demands. Learn from those who are doing to help you evaluate services in your current operations that may lend themselves to future shared service arrangements. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.