What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Obama signs bill that kills DOD pay-for-performance system

NSPS employees to go back to General Schedule; unions laud effort

 President Barack Obama today signed the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2010 that will eventually kill the controversial National Security Personnel System, designed to link pay raises to job performance for Defense Department employees.

More than 200,000 DOD employees under the NSPS will revert to the General Schedule system by 2012 under the bill’s provisions.

The law's passage pleased some critics of the NSPS.

“There is evidence that pay-for-performance was discriminatory and used as a way to take money from lower-paid employees and routed to higher-paid employees," said Randy Erwin, legislative director at the National Federation of Federal Employees. DOD "tried to do too much, too fast. Pay for performance was supposed to motivate, but instead it’s done the opposite.”

The American Federation of Government Employees, in a statement responding to the news, said NSPS the program is “costly, unwieldy, discriminatory, complicated, opaque and mistrusted by DOD civilian employees at all levels.”

The system's proponents had championed it for being flexible and giving managers more freedom to reward their best employees. In 2008, Mary Lacey -- then the program executive officer for NSPS -- reported that the highest-rated employees in the system got raises averaging 10 percent under NSPS. Across the board, she said, raises under NSPS averaged 5.4 percent.

Still, eliminating the NSPS will not solve major problerms with DOD's personnel system, insiders speaking on background said. In addition to fixing a lack of trust among DOD's employees, a new pay system will need to be established within about six months, and will likely need to include some measures to rate performance, they said.

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a staff reporter covering defense and national security.

Reader comments

Fri, Nov 6, 2009 cae NE

Our mgr said if you just put in your time doing your job well, that's what you were hired and paid to do, therefore you get COL adjustments only. You must show above and beyond, taking on more responsibility,etc, to get a raise. However other dept mgrs gave the new rate as long as you hadn't done someting to NOT deserve it; and still a third used it unfairly to punish and reward. So guidelines are needed to make things level.

Thu, Nov 5, 2009

Many employees are abusing NSPS. I know one employee changes three jobs in DC area in 2009. She negotiated and received 5% increase pay for each job. This employee have received 15 % increase pay in 2009. The turn over in DC area is very high due to employees who know how to get around with NSPS. Managers in agencies should not have such power to offer higher salaries.

Thu, Nov 5, 2009

Many employees are abusing the NSPS system. I know one employee changes three jobs in DC area in 2009. Every job, she negotiated and got at least 5% raise. Just in 2009 along, the person had 15 % increased pay. In DC area, employee turn over rate is very high due to employees know that they can able to take advantage of NSPS. Managers in agencies should not have such power to offer higher salaries.

Thu, Nov 5, 2009 John Boston MA

Reading some comments, we should reward according to how hard we work, not how well we accomplish the job or go above and beyond. Quality comes to mind also...like being able to spell and form sentences in English. Whenever you hear words like “costly, unwieldy, discriminatory, complicated, opaque and mistrusted" from a union, you know the system was Fair.

Wed, Nov 4, 2009 George DON

Interesting comments. For our command none of the comments really hit the mark. By the time we were moved into NSPS the support contractor was 'BUILDING' the monster DATABASE to feed the beast. Your rating is in October, you might find out IF you did OK in Late January. Performance was not the real operational concept, it was a game to see IF you had the words that implied (supported) a 'good' rating. No solid metrics, lets face it the initial limit was 1024 characters to sum up how you delivered the high PERFORMANCE. The problems go on and on...

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

eSeminar

  • Where Cyberwarfare and Cybersecurity Meet

    We invite you to attend the third event in this three-part series on Cybersecurity. 1105 Government Information Group will present a panel of government and cybersecurity experts including Steven Heacox, Principal Systems Security Engineer at the Joint Information Operations Warfare Center, DOD; Gregory T. Garcia, the nation's first presidentially-appointed Assistant Secretary for CyberSecurity and Communications with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2006-2008; and Jeffrey Carr, cyber strategies consultant and author of Inside Cyber Warfare, in this editorial webcast on Tuesday, April 13 at 11 a.m., where they will discuss the cyberwarfare threat to both industry and government, as well as strategies to consolidate the wider cybersecurity mission. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.

Highlights from the current issue