The real reason behind the government brain drain

Federal agencies are so sensitive to the loss of institutional knowledge because their employees tend to stick around so long

The federal “brain drain” legend—the notion that the federal government will experience a huge loss of institutional knowledge as a tide of retirees exits the doors—has been making the rounds for years. And one of these years—in spite of the fact that people are working longer—it will start to happen.

But don’t blame it all on retiring baby boomers—that generation that filled jobs in government’s swelling ranks during the last 30 or 40 years. Because the private sector, where boomers also work, doesn’t anticipate the same loss of experience in the workplace.

The reason: a typical private-sector worker just doesn’t stick around in a job long enough to gain the same depth of experience as an average public-sector worker.

According to a new report from the Employee Benefit Research Institute, over the last 25 years, “career jobs” have not really existed for American workers as a whole. EBRI says that the “median tenure”—defined as the midpoint of wage and salary workers’ length of employment in a current job—of private and public workers combined has really not changed during the last 25 years: 5.1 years at the same job in 2008, compared with 5.0 years in 1983.

But break those statistics into private and public, and the story changes.

While private-sector workers’ median tenure has been steady, at about 3.9 years over the period, the median tenure for public-sector workers increased from 6.0 years in 1983 to 7.0 years in 2008—an average about 80 percent higher than that of the private sector. What’s more, almost 10 percent of public-sector workers have 25 or more years of tenure—read “experience”—a proportion much higher than that in the private sector.

EBRI’s numbers include all public workers, not just feds, whose numbers are much higher. According to a 2008 report from the Congressional Research Service, the average length of service in the federal workforce was 14.7 years in 2008. And approximately 20 percent of feds in 2008 had more than 25 years of service.

So after the federal brain is drained, will federal service continue to attract new talent? Judge for yourself—according to trends examined by EBRI, “most U.S. private-sector workers will never become eligible for health insurance in retirement through a former employer.”

These days, that fact alone may be enough to boost competition for federal jobs.

About the Author

Federal Daily, an 1105 Government Information Group site, features news and resources for federal and postal employees.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Wed, Jan 13, 2010

I have worked with both types of government employees -- the best (wondering why they don't bail to private industry and quadruple their salaries) and the worst (those who should have been fired years ago and make everyone who intersects their incompetence and snarly attitudes completely miserable). This is really no different than the corporate world, where the best and brightest carry the company and the dregs drag the organization down but manage to keep their jobs by managing upward well. The attraction of government jobs is not only the healthcare but also the retirement pay and a true 40-hour work week; integrator employees who want to kick it back a notch from their 60-hour work week are moving into govvie positions and doing the same job.

Wed, Jan 13, 2010

So if health care reform passes, fewer people motivated by health problems will feel compelled to seek govt employment, opening up slots for those who otherwise would not consider the government as a realistic or desireable option. As far as institutional knowledge, this has for the most part been replaced by google in the outside world. Whereas back in the 70s paid staffers with PHDs and Masters were common on corporate staff, most necessary research can be done by an intern, eliminating the necessity for high paid engineers, analysts, and technicians thus preserving budget for those experienced in such value added skills as management and accounting.

Wed, Jan 13, 2010 Scott MD

This could be a blessing in disguise. I find that some of the institutional people have been the most resistant to change. They tend to have few---if any---technical skills, giving IT guys extra work on user training that take away from the things they could do to help everyone on the whole. The other thing this report shows is that the government does not clean its ranks often enough. Just like Congress, most agencies should have 90% of their employees replaced.

Wed, Jan 13, 2010

Also, institutional knowledge in the public sector becomes more valuable as a result of relatively frequent changes in the political appointee leadership class, which also offers periodic opportunities for career resurrection.

Wed, Jan 13, 2010

You fail to take into account the switch away from CSRS to FERS.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above