The 2.0 presidency: Obama to stage YouTube-based exchange

Experts say the president's Feb. 3 venture helps validate the role in social media in governance

As the president of the United States last week addressed Congress about the state of the union, he’s going before the public Feb. 3 to answer their questions about the state of the country via YouTube.

President Barack Obama will use the Web to offer the public a direct and participatory way to communicate with him, the White House wrote Jan. 26 on its blog.

Norman Ornstein, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute and long-time political columnist, said Obama’s event is a carryover from his campaign where he pioneered the use of social media in politics. While a sitting president has never taken citizens’ questions via YouTube, it’s not new to Obama, he said.

“It’s an extension of My.BarackObama.com,” he said. And “it certainly validates social media.”

The online forum is another vehicle to reach out to the public and give them a voice directly to him, experts say.

Daniel Castro, senior analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, said more people are able to join in the political process with online forums such as Monday’s event.

While the event may be a validation, it may not advance social media initiatives too far, said Mark Drapeau, director of innovative social engagement for Microsoft’s U.S. Public Sector and FCW columnist. Many people have been experimenting with new forms of media for a while now.

“The president taking questions via YouTube or other channels may be novel for him, but others in and out of government have been doing this or versions of this for quite some time,” Drapeau said. He said most people won’t be more than mildly impressed by the event.

Furthermore, the event will appeal most to the truly tech-savvy people who have more than experimented with social media. He said the White House event may not grab an overly broad segment of the population.

“Citizens who don’t spend time with new media will most likely not be drawn into such an event at this point,” Drapeau said.

Last year has been a sea change for the government's adoption of new media, Drapeau said. The Obama administration has been spreading out quickly into the realm of Web 2.0. Agencies have used social media Web sites, such as Facebook and Twitter, to spread messages about relief efforts in Haiti, as the country recovers from the destructive earthquake. For example, the State Department began sharing information on its official Facebook pages hours after the earthquake struck.

The General Services Administration, a hotbed of such technologies, is leading the Better Buy Project, which takes a collaborative approach to finding innovative ways to streamline government acquisition process. Also, in 2009, GSA signed agreements with a number of Web 2.0 and social media providers so federal agencies can use new-media tools while meeting the government’s legal requirements.

“The real question for the future is not whether such tools will be used, but whether they will be used well to reach organizational goals,” Drapeau said.

These types of events have pitfalls though. Tech-savvy and politically motivated interest groups can use online forums to push their agenda disproportionately louder compared to the size of their membership, Castro said. For example, causes like medical marijuana get more attention than in a more traditional offline forum.

“In a political environment, individuals will always try to game the system to win an advantage,” he said. Technologists are still trying to solve these types of problems so that all voices can be heard.

Featured

Reader comments

Mon, Feb 1, 2010

"... validates social media." How profound. (How does one get a cush job writing stuff like this?)

Mon, Feb 1, 2010 Buddy Ohio

Too bad that his GOVERNMENT employees will not be able to participat since YOUTUBE is blocked, Twitter, Facebook, They all "Websensed" out. at least in the DOT MIL world or supposed to be do to so called "security" threats and lack of bandwidth.

Mon, Feb 1, 2010 RayW

Looks like a disenfranchisement of the poor, the elderly, and a few other groups who do not have access to utube etc. or who have had been burned by infections from that type of site and do not use it. I live in what might be considered a middle class area and about half the people I know use the medias stated, mostly the kids. But the article does point out that this media does give weight to certain small groups over what might be the mainstream interest of the USA. I do know that the only trojan infection I have ever gotten came from one of those sites, so I do not use them. My kids' machine which does allow access to those sites has several warnings up now, and as far as I can tell from the logs, that is the source of infection. A powerful political tool, but easy to abuse if you have the time or the tools.

Mon, Feb 1, 2010 Ken Washington, DC

We are living in an information overload era, and one of the key solutions is to make information appealing, relevant, truthful and necessary. This channel of communication may achieve this end, but this is to be determined.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above