What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Cyber threat growing at unprecedented rate, intell chief says

Director of national intelligence details intell agencies' assessment of cyber threat

Malicious cyber activity is growing at an unprecedented rate, severely threatening the nation's public and private information infrastructure, the government's top intelligence official said today.

Dennis Blair, the director of national intelligence, told members of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee,that “in the dynamic of cyberspace, the technology balance right now favors malicious actors rather than legal actors, and is likely to continue that way for quite some time.”

Sensitive information is stolen daily from government and private-sector networks and intelligence officials often find persistent, unauthorized, and sometimes unattributable presences on exploited networks, Blair said in prepared remarks about intelligence agencies' annual threat assessment.

“We cannot be certain that our cyberspace infrastructure will remain available and reliable during a time of crisis,” he testified.


Related Story

Intelligence community assesses cyber threat


Meanwhile, Blair said cyber criminals have “displayed remarkable technical innovation with an agility presently exceeding the response capability of network defenders.” He added network convergence and channel consolidation potentially increases vulnerabilities and consequences of failure in security.

Blair said intelligence agencies are integrating cybersecurity with counterintelligence and bolstering the ability to understand, detect, attribute and counter cyber threats. Blair said he directed the creation of a cyber directorate to provide outreach for foreign intelligence threat warnings and ensure that insider threats are stopped.

Blair said threats come from nation states, terrorist networks, organizational criminal groups, and individuals. He also said cooperation with industry and international partners is necessary for cybersecurity.

“I am here today to stress that, acting independently, neither the U.S. government nor the private sector can fully control or protect the country’s information infrastructure,” Blair testified. “Yet, with increased national attention and investment in cyber security initiatives, I am confident the United States can implement measures to mitigate this negative situation.”

About the Author

Ben Bain is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

Reader comments

Thu, Feb 25, 2010

Its a severe risk, but not impossible to solve with the correct attention. the basic concept, get secure and vital systems off the common internet threads either physically or via secure hardware encryption. Sorry but there is no reason the power company or bank to bank links need to be accessible to the public. The implementation may be difficult and costly on large scale. But like the days gone by, if you didnt plug you phone line into the computer nobody could put a virus on or hack your system without physically accessing it.

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 JD CA

Always fun to talk tough about China and their increasingly brazen cyber attacks; but like it or not, they already "own" us. For you "Trek" fans, China are the Borg and we the emotionally delicate Federation. In the U.S. we reward ($$) financiers, litigious lawyers and the politically-connected; i.e., those who don't design, build, or fix ANYTHING. China on the other hand has an ARMY of well funded/equipped tech-savvy cyber experts. China is eating our lunch!

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 Ocrates Austin, TX

@M - your comments are blinded by political perspectives. This is exactly why we are losing the cyberwars, because some people would rather divide the country for political "talking points" rather than do anything in defense of the nation as a whole. You need to remember your education and recall Aesop's words: "United we stand, divided we fall." (he was the first author of that phrase - so often used by others thereafter). If people are willing to work together - we cannot be defeated. When people are contrarians and don't care about their nation, just their petty ideology - then we are doomed to fail. Your answer seems to point to a desire for this nation to fail? Congratulations, you've shown us that you care more about politics than the nation! At least you're free to say that, just as I am free to say thanks to the first amendment, no one stops you from showing us how you really feel about the country. Have a nice day.

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 Jeffrey A. Williams Frisco Texas

Adm. Blair is exactly correct in his assesment. However the cybersecurity threat has been known for a number of years and articulated voluminously to government officials and LEA's sense Richard Clark first testified befor both houses of congress. He was subsequently scoffed at than and soon after resinged in than held position with the previous administration. Much was lost and is continuing to be lost as a result.

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 Mark Hill AFB

Jon, I think if you look at a lot of Sci-Fi writers, many of the good ones have had technical backgrounds, and I think those are the ones Ray was talking about. I looked up Gibson (never heard of him) on Google, and I agree, cyberpunk is probably not a good source. But back to the topic. Having been involved in computers since the 70's and PCs since the mid 80's, I see the progression of the bad guys fitting the progression of technology and the narrowing of the choices of operating systems. Then when microsoft went through the quick and dirty effort to make IE integrated into the OS in response to the dubious dealings they did (1998), I saw a large increase in opportunity that appeared with that new path. Now we have the US government having us all on the same OS, same word processor, same email, and using central servers, and you have an easy single point of attack. And consider, at my brother's company, they just canned a bunch of computer folks, and he is of the opinion that some of the best ones were in that bunch because their noses were always in the computers and never somewhere else. A lot of talent with free time on the hands and maybe nothing to lose. And as oracle said, China has all but published what they are trying to do several years ago, and they are not the first country to do so. Ironic that our (USA) gov created the net, and now the net is a knife at its throat. I need to start writing obvious papers like this with big words and skimmed data, maybe getting published will help with the promotion chain.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above

eSeminar

  • The Top 100 Government Contractors NickWakeman_60

    Washington Technology Editor in Chief Nick Wakeman hosted an eSeminar, highlighting the magazine’s 17th annual Top 100 issue and the fears and hopes driving today’s market. Read more

Federal Computer Week eNewsletters

  • Subscribe to Newsletters Subscribe

    Federal Computer Week's eNewsletters deliver the latest policy and management news to your inbox.