DHS should assess effects of physical border fence, watchdog says

Border fence cost $2.6 billion vs. $1.6 billion for SBInet

The Homeland Security Department has spent $2.6 billion on physical fencing and barriers at the border of the United States and Mexico during the past five years, but it has not studied the effectiveness of that spending, according to a new report today from the Government Accountability Office.

As of April, DHS’ Customs and Border Protection agency has completed 646 of the 652 planned miles of physical fencing and tactical infrastructure at the southwest border, with the remaining miles to be finished by year’s end.

The agency asserted that the physical fencing and barriers, along with additional agents, has increased the area of border under tactical control, GAO said in the report.


Related story:

Senate committee chairman suggests killing the virtual fence


However, “Despite a $2.6 billion investment, [CBP] cannot account separately for the impact of tactical infrastructure,” the GAO report said. “Until CBP determines the contribution of tactical infrastructure to border security, it is not positioned to address the impact of this investment.”

GAO said that in September 2009 it recommended that CBP conduct a cost-effective evaluation of the physical fencing and vehicle barriers to determine their effects on border security. CBP officials agreed with the recommendation and said actions were under way.

Meanwhile, during the same period, CBP has spent $1.6 billion on the Secure Border Initiative Network electronic surveillance system, which currently spans 53 miles of the border of Arizona and Mexico, the GAO report said.

GAO noted that it has issued numerous audits and reports on SBInet, most recently at a congressional hearing in April. Today's report summarized previous findings on SBInet.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

2014 Rising Star Awards

Help us find the next generation of leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Tue, May 11, 2010

no Americans want to pick strawberries, in the grueling heat and mud, no way...and our kids now would never take a job like that!

Fri, May 7, 2010 JIM

The border protection measures are money well spent. If the US Government would enforce the existing laws, border states would not have to do the job for them.

Wed, May 5, 2010 Concerned US Citizen

I have been following these stories regarding border fencing and virtual security for months now. I also did some research on the statistics of illegal's crossing the borders and the resulting cost to the United States for harboring these illegal's. It is mind boggling the cost to the US that continues to mount that is not being disclosed or discussed in these news coverage's. Our own US citizens continue to loose their opportunity for employment from the countless years and millions of illegal's continuing to enter the US! The cost of securing the borders is high to substantiate a business case to deter illegal's seeking a better quality of life, but will it be to high of cost when the Taliban enter the US border and start killing innocent men, woman and children at will. Will the headlines read "virtual fence could of prevented Taliban from entering US" or "Thousands of lives lost in Az at the hands of terrorist that virtual fence could of prevented"?

I believe the US is making a very costly, but wise investment now to protect the future! consider that.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above