DHS would be cyber power center under Lieberman/Collins proposal

Senior senators on the Homeland Security Committee introduce comprehensive cybersecurity bill

Three senior senators on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee today introduced comprehensive cybersecurity legislation that would establish a center in the Homeland Security Department to protect the country’s computer networks, power grid and critical infrastructure from cyberattacks.

Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.), Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Thomas Carper (D-Del.) proposed the creation of a new center National Center for Cybersecurity and Communications (NCCC) at DHS to lead the federal effort to protect civilian government and private-sector computer networks. The head of the NCCC would be confirmed by the Senate.

Lieberman and Collins are the chairman and the ranking Republican, respectively, on the full committee; Carper chairs that panel’s Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security Subcommittee.

The NCCC would be responsible for developing, overseeing and enforcing information security throughout the federal government. That responsibility had previously been handled by the Office of Management and Budget’s Electronic Government and Information Technology Office.

The measure would also require a cyber policy office in the Executive Office of the President, also with a Senate-confirmed director. The bill would also reform the Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and require real-time monitoring of threats against government networks. The House recently approved similar reforms to FISMA and for the White House cybersecurity office.


Related stories

Cyber policy snared in legislative tangle

NASA hits FISMA reset button 


The senators also want to give the president limited authority to take emergency actions to protect critical infrastructure from cyber threats and provide liability protections to companies that comply with related requirements. In addition, the bill would require developing a strategy to deal with security risks to the supply chain of information technology products. The measure would also reform the way the government recruits, hires and trains cybersecurity personnel.

Under the measure, the cybersecurity center would:

  • Collaborate with industry to establish risk-based security requirements for critical infrastructure and best practices for cybersecurity
  • Receive reports from owners and operators of critical infrastructure on any significant breaches
  • Produce and share warning, analysis and threat information with the private sector and
  • Incorporate DHS’ existing United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team.

The proposal joins an already crowded legislative docket of cybersecurity-related bills. For example, the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee approved a different comprehensive cybersecurity bill proposed by Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-W. Va.) and Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) earlier this year. The Commerce Committee’s measure doesn’t focus on the Homeland Security Department as does the Lieberman, Collins, and Carper measure.

At a press conference today, Lieberman said although there are differences between his approach and that of the Commerce Committee, the differences aren’t irreconcilable. Lieberman said his staff members and those of Collins and Carper had been working with the staff members of the Commerce Committee, and the staffs had made progress in minimizing conflicts between the different approaches.

However, Lieberman also said DHS is the only logical place for coordinating cyber defense efforts that involve securing non-defense, civilian government networks and private networks.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is very committed to doing something during this congressional session to protect the country’s computer networks, Lieberman said. Lieberman added that he plans to hold a committee hearing on the bill next week, and he hopes to have a mark up session for the measure the week after that, with the goal of having the bill clear his committee before the July 4 recess.

“Now that we’re introducing this today, we’re putting our foot on the gas pedal,” Lieberman said.

Featured

Reader comments

Mon, Jun 14, 2010

This is the wrong department to do this. A DHS mandate is to gather information about everyone that they can. They have not shown any concern about keeping any information private if making it public or internally available is in their interest. It is not in their best interest to help secure others. Good idea, wrong department.

Fri, Jun 11, 2010

The FBI has a not well publicized Cyber "Neighborhood Watch" type program called "InfraGard" which was created to be a clearing house for reports of cyber attacks against critial information technology systems and networks in the private sector. Hopefully there will be collaboration and coordination between the DHS and other agencies now doing these Cyber defense functions.

Fri, Jun 11, 2010

Overall, this is a critical area for the nation. Cyber attack is pervasive in government, commercial, and private networks. Most of our IT and much of our communications equipment is made in China. And we trust it!!! Note that the memory stick you just bought came equipped with internal software - from China. It will encrypt your info to "protect" it, but then what does it do?? However, wrong agency! DHS simply does not have the IT or related telecommunications skills for this. Nor are they receptive to advice or assistance from DoD - but Defense is probably the only Department or Agency that has the IT skills for this. Get past Title 10 and try the new Cyber Command or NSA.

Fri, Jun 11, 2010

The same people that oversee FEMA and TSA? I'll have to get back to you on that one.

Fri, Jun 11, 2010

DHS can't even properly secure thier own computer systems, how could they be capable to secure the nation's cybersecurity environment?????

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above