Gates' budget-cutting plan leaves Defense CIO role in limbo

Post has been vacant since the George W. Bush administration

Of all the plans and initiatives Defense Secretary Robert Gates outlined in his budget-cutting portfolio, one is emerging as perhaps the biggest uncertainty: What will happen with the still-vacant Defense chief information officer role?

The post has been open since the George W. Bush administration when John Grimes left, and filled on an acting basis by Cheryl Roby ever since. In March President Barack Obama nominated California CIO Teri Takai for the position, but last week’s strike of Takai’s hearing from the Senate Armed Forces Committee docket was a harbinger of what was to come.

It would now appear Takai's position is in limbo until Congress and the Pentagon sort out new roles and responsibilities for the Defense CIO, leaving many to  wonder whether she will stick around for the outcome.


Related stories

Insourcing failed, DOD's Gates says. Now what?

Defense CIO confirmation on ice for now


With the release of the new plans, Gates has announced he will close the Networks and Information Integration (NII) office that houses the Defense CIO and shift the role, as well as other responsibilities, to the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA).

According to a presentation by Christine Fox, director of Defense Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, DISA itself will undergo major changes as it takes on the command and control duties of NII and also the ill-fated Joint Forces Command and Joint Staff. The result will be a new DISA/CIO organization, she said.

Gates said the CIO job also will see some changes, becoming stronger and “under its umbrella, responsibility for daily operations will be assigned to DISA. A refashioned DISA will perform the department’s CIO function.”

Although no one is exactly sure how or where the specific duties, offices and responsibilities will be assigned, analysts are noting that the changes spell more authority for DISA, and that the agency and its leader, Army Lt. Gen. Carroll F. Pollett, are well-equipped to handle the transformation.

“The big story here is that this is going to be a tremendous plus for DISA. Many of the eliminated functions will be moved there, and some are already there so it may not be a huge change,” said Warren Suss of federal IT consultancy Suss Consulting. “This is going to improve DOD’s ability to respond to mission requirements, and I think it will be a relatively smooth transition.”

And while the closure of NII has come as a surprise to much of the Defense community, Suss suspects it isn’t exactly blindsiding the most important stakeholders. “You can be sure this reorganization is being made in full consultation with [Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Corps Gen. James Cartwright] and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Cartwright is a supporter of near-term, most-effective support to the warfighter just like Pollett is,” Suss said.

However, it appears not everyone agrees the closures are the right answer. Nextgov’s Bob Brewin reports that former Defense CIO Grimes believes the Pentagon did not conduct a thorough analysis of the consequences of shutting down NII.

Regardless of where the DOD CIO position ends up organizationally, it’s not going to be completely eliminated, since it’s federally mandated under the Clinger-Cohen Act. But Gates has not elaborated on the responsibilities of the restructured CIO job or its associated roles, such as a deputy or assistant secretary. Right now, Dave Wennergren serves under Roby as acting deputy CIO.

 

2014 Rising Star Awards

Help us find the next generation of leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Fri, Aug 13, 2010

My experiences with DISA have been very hit-or-miss. Lots of promises and very few useful products. Maybe moving the CIO function under DISA will shake things up enough to see some improvement.

Fri, Aug 13, 2010 hansel

The USAF wasted untold millions of dollars since 1970 hiring contractors to do the precision and measurement jobs for the USAF. In 2009 the USAF finally decided to use USAF people to do the PMEL jobs and not use contractors because the contractors couldn't do the job. This was apparent right away but took how many years to realize. 29 years is a long time

Thu, Aug 12, 2010 RD DISCO ATLANTA GA.

Instead of cutting the Defense CIO and Defense Dept budget until we are unable to present an operational defense for this countries interest both locally and abroad, why not cut some of the 700 billion stimulus budget and the extra 26 billion recently added to it?

After reviewing the Stimulus Accountability reports on the grants being dished out from the Economic Stimulus bill, I believe diverting some of that to the US Defense would be money well spent, rather than to the current list of contractors across the nation lining their pockets, build new bridges, enhance internet services in low income areas, funding for Electrician Start Up Business Groups, and building now vocational rehabilitation facilities etc. etc. etc. which is where the money is going. And has it helped the Economy?

Two years ago if anyone had told me nearly 100 BILLION DOLLARS was going to be pumped into the U.S. Economy, I would have expected an ‘INCREDIBLE’ rebound in America’s economic woes.

Has anyone seen it? I certainly haven’t...! Give the Defense Dept. nearly 100 billion and we will more than likely have something to show for it.

Thu, Aug 12, 2010

The statement "the eliminated functions will be moved" ultimatley means no cost savings. If a function is eliminated it and those persons performing that function are also eliminated, not moved. That saves money in a budget. The DoD for too long have eliminated functions without eliminating the jobs that performed it. Functions are eliminated then jobs are then created for these (eliminated function)people somewhere else thus creating another function to eliminate later. No saving here. It just appears a budjet savings has occured

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above