Group charges State with penalizing officers seeking mental heath treatment

A group of current and former State Department employees criticized the department security clearance revocation process, which they say unfairly penalizes Foreign Service officers for seeking mental health treatment.

In a statement issued Sept. 8, Concerned Foreign Service Officers said that although Secretary of State Hillary Clinton urged FSOs to get treatment, it was not always in their own best interest to do so. Clinton said that no Foreign Service Officer had ever lost a security clearance due to having sought mental health treatment.

While CFSO pointed out that none of the 13 criteria for which a security clearance can be revoked are titled “seeking mental health treatment,” it noted that a revocation could be justified under such categories as “mental disorders” or “personal conduct.” In fact, the group said, Diplomatic Security (DS) revocation letters are short, and unlike those of other agencies, rarely provide details.

“But there have been well-documented cases where the unmentioned ‘cause for concern’ under the official guideline was the simple act of seeking mental health treatment and the biased reaction to it by DS adjudicators,” the group said.

“As long as DS continues to adjudicate security clearances without a real whole-person review, without verification of the facts and without any real oversight,” the statement said, they “will continue to revoke security clearances of employees who obtain mental health treatment.”

Featured

Reader comments

Sat, Sep 18, 2010 ellen bruggeman Seymour, Texas

It doesn't behoove the State Dept. to encourage employees to get help then slamming the door on them for doing so. It is right to be concerned over the treatment of those seeking mental health assistance. Would the Dept. be concerned if someone sought medical assistance for a physical health issue? I doubt it.

Fri, Sep 17, 2010 David

This bias against those who seek treatment will only serve to discourage those who really need treatment from seeking it out. Eventually you get a "Going Postal" situation, and the department's leadership will all be shrugging their shoulders wondering how one of their people could go so far over the edge.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above