Union urges curbs to contractor salaries

Spurred by the several legislative and policy proposals targeting the federal workforce, a prominent labor union is raising concerns about what it calls “excessive” contractor salaries and is suggesting that contractor employees shouldn't earn more than $200,000 annually.

In a letter sent May 12 to the leaders of the Senate Budget Committee, the American Federation of Government Employees urged lawmakers to reject recent proposals aimed at reducing federal salaries or shrinking the size of the federal workforce without corresponding cuts to federal contracting.

AFGE touched on several workforce-related issues, including the Defense Department’s plan to cap the size of its civilian workforce at fiscal 2010 levels.


Related stories:

Are bills targeting the federal workforce destined to fail?

Hoyer won't back administration's proposal on political contributions


The union said the Army alone will have to reduce its workforce by 33,000 civilians over the next few years. “In practical terms, the initiative will require new work and expansions to existing work to be automatically contracted out – even if we can do the work more efficiently or the work is inherently governmental,” Beth Moten, AFGE’s legislative and political director, wrote. “The initiative has put the civilian workforce back into a death spiral.”

AFGE also said while politicians continue to attack federal pay levels, there has not been much talk about the amount of pay contractors receive.

“What’s been conspicuously missing from the debate, of course, has been any discussion of pay for contractors – even though the number of contractors exceeds the number of federal civil servants and many contractors earn several times the maximum federal salary,” Moten said.

The union cited the five highest salaries at government contractor Booz Allen Hamilton – ranging between $3 million and $4 million – to illustrate its point. It also recommended that contractor salaries be restricted so that they are not reimbursed by taxpayers in excess of what is earned by officials who fill cabinet level positions.

“By implementing this reform, we can save money for the taxpayers and ensure that the highest paid contractors are finally required to make sacrifices,” Moten wrote. “At a time of budget stringency, few parts of the budget or tax code should be off limits for scrutiny – and certainly not the lucrative salaries for contractors that are ultimately paid for through taxpayer dollars.”

About the Author

Alyah Khan is a staff writer covering IT policy.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Tue, May 31, 2011 Bugs

Re the comment about why a Federal Employee needs a union: Unions come into being for employees because of disconnects between management and employees. If management and employees have a good relationship, they have no need for a union. I have seen situations in which employees said "no" to union representation, because they saw no valid need. In my own case working as a government professional without union representation, given an opportunity I would GLADLY have voted for representation. The reason: inept, dictatorial, micromanagement--and we, the underlinings, had no voice. And yes, I could go for 3-4 Mil as a contractor...but those levels are generally reserved for former defense contractor execs, generals, etc.

Fri, May 27, 2011

It does not matter what side gets cut. The same ammount of work has to get done in any case. You could cut jobs on both sides and in a few months the back log would regenerate the need for those jobs. Within a year we would be back at this debate. Personaly I could use a vacation.

Tue, May 24, 2011

Can someone please tell me why a Federal Employee needs a union in the first place? Just think how much money the taxpayers could save by getting rid of the union overhead...the mind boggles.

Mon, May 23, 2011

Clearly congress has not looked at itself and its bloated expenditure ledger. The argument that cutting federal or contractor wages is going to solve the deficit issue is a smoke screen by the GOP. The root of the deficit problem is two wars that are approaching the decade mark with an average half a billion a month price tag each. Tax breaks for the wealthies 1% another 1 billion taken from the revenue side. Medicare & Medicade Fraud. Do the math, we have been hermorrhaging taxpayer dollars and it has caught up with us finally. Now the plan is to punish the workers to correct the errors of Congress.

Thu, May 19, 2011

Bravo for CLASS WARFARE! Nothing quite as good as dividing and conquering.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above