Is data center consolidation worth the bother?

The deadline is approaching for agencies to submit their data center consolidation plans, and Federal CIO Vivek Kundra is playing it up. In a Federal Computer Week article by Rutrell Yasin, Kundra said that when the plans are published on Oct. 7, people will see that the reports are the "golden source of data around cost savings, around every data center that agencies own [and] a very specific road map for which data centers will be shut down by 2015."

However, not everyone is as enthusiastic as Kundra. Derrick Harris, writing at GigaOM, reports that data center consolidation might not be easy.

Harris’ article, like many others on the topic, is pegged to a MeriTalk survey that revealed widespread skepticism among federal IT managers about the value or feasibility of consolidation. But Harris learned from a Juniper Networks representative that one perceived problem is the proliferation of custom-coded applications in the federal data center infrastructure. The presence of such apps makes consolidating data centers impractical until some apps are rewritten or replaced with standard ones, the Juniper rep told Harris.

But other information has emerged that could validate Kundra's plans. A critical reason to consolidate data centers is to reduce power consumption, based on the relatively obvious principle that fewer servers in fewer buildings require less electricity.

Damon Poeter, writing at PCMag.com, reports that the growth of data center power consumption has been far less than experts believed it would be. Power consumption by data centers worldwide doubled from 2000 to 2005 but grew by only 56 percent from 2005 to 2010, according to a study by Jonathan Koomey, an associate professor at Stanford University’s Woods Institute for the Environment.

Koomey cited several reasons why the growth in power consumption has slowed. They include data center consolidation and increased use of server virtualization, which would seem to suggest that the Obama administration is on the right track.

About the Author

Technology journalist Michael Hardy is a former FCW editor.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Mon, Aug 15, 2011 Bryan Indianapolis

Having the DoD Data Center can be a great positive if the NSA shares its computer and data protection technology and there is cooperation among the co-located super agencies. That alone is a cost savings that can be captured above the original master plan.

Tue, Aug 9, 2011

Yes, move the US data to the cloud so foreign national spies can work as low cost techies. We save power costs and labor costs. We lose confidentiality and oversight but hey those are the risks. Just because availabilty is one part of the security triad, doesn't mean clouds are providing more security. Your biggest threat to your information is the inside threat. In a cloud, you no longer have control over the data or the infrastructure. Oh but there is identity management. All an insider has to do is backup or split the data feed and send it to another system. So what they get fined if they are breeched? We're talking about highly sensitive government information that can be manipulated for massive profit or involve people's lives. The commercial banks are breeched all the time. Cyber security is about having many layers of protection which cost money. Commercial entities are about limiting the layers to make a profit.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above