DOD taking "DISA first" strategy in data center consolidation efforts

New progress report lays out plans for future, including DISA leading in enterprise services

The Defense Department has released its data center consolidation progress report and strategy, and among its approaches to streamlining IT infrastructure is a new, long-term policy to turn to the Defense Information Systems Agency to provide IT and data services.

DOD is also focusing on “core” data centers that will absorb the functions of data centers scattered throughout the department and its components, allowing those other data centers to be closed down.

“The purpose of consolidation is to optimize DOD computing centers and establish core data centers to support critical enterprise services,” according to the report, which is dated Nov. 8 but appears to have been released on or around Nov. 23. “DOD and its [components] are considering all options for achieving consolidation that includes migrating infrastructure to DISA enterprise computing centers, valid commercial options to reduce costs of IT services, cross-component co-hosting [and] virtualization/cloud computing, to name a few.”

So far, the Air Force, Army and the Defense Logistics Agency have adopted the “DISA first” strategy, meaning those agencies will consider DISA for application and data hosting before pursuing any other solutions, the report read. DISA’s ability to offer hosting and IT services would reduce the need for local contractor support and services, although those options still may be considered under circumstances where DISA services aren’t practical.

DOD as a whole and the service components have all made strides in consolidating their numerous, often redundant data centers, and the progress thus far was provided as part of broader efforts under the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative. The other 23 agencies that are part of the federal CIO council provided their own progress reports by the Oct. 7 deadline set forth by the Office of Management and Budget.

According to DOD’s progress report, the department originally identified 52 data centers to shutter in fiscal 2011, and another seven were added to the list. Currently, all but four of the 59 data centers slated for shutdown are on schedule. The report estimates that DOD’s overall efficiencies efforts, of which the data center consolidations are part of, will help the department save more than $1 billion annually by fiscal 2016, and additionally more than $3 billion over the future years defense between 2013 and 2018.

The Army’s initial goal is to close 185 data centers by fiscal 2015, with more to be considered after that point. The Air Force plans to reduce its data centers by 47 percent by fiscal 2015, while the Navy is looking to shutter half of its own data centers in the same timeframe. The Marines are focusing on deploying enterprise services and applications through its Marine Corps Enterprise Information Technology Services.

Meanwhile, the DLA will seek to cut 75 percent of its servers and 90 percent of its own data centers, and the Military Health Systems is targeting a 70 percent reduction in data centers over a five-year timeframe.

The consolidation efforts haven’t been without struggles, though. DOD’s report was delayed by the department’s sheer mass of inventory and challenges in coordinating with the various, disparate stakeholders that must be engaged in the process, according to DOD spokesperson Lt. Col. April Cunningham.

Budget uncertainty is also making it difficult to see into the future, even as near-term as fiscal 2012, according to the report.

“Continuing budget resolutions have delayed the implementation of consolidation plans. Funding is a major risk factor to data center consolidation,” the report noted. “Although significant savings are expected in future years, those savings cannot be borrowed to fund required investments for consolidating data centers. Consolidation requires an investment in labor, new and more efficient hardware, upgrades to computer facilities, and increased operating costs when some legacy systems run in parallel with new systems.”

Still, despite the challenges and lessons learned, the “DISA first” strategy is being seen as a beacon, according to the report.

“DOD has learned several lessons through this initiative. One encouraging sign is the willingness of DOD components to adopt a ‘DISA first’ strategy to transfer applications and infrastructure to a shared service provider,” the report read.

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Fri, Dec 23, 2011

Option of having another platform of having another analytical communicative process is beneficial to the way we can interpret intelligent frequencies.

Wed, Nov 30, 2011

In the second month of FY12, how can the report say this: "Of these, all but 4 are on schedule for closure in FY11 for a total of 55 data centers."? If they are on schedule for closure in FY11, they are closed!

Wed, Nov 30, 2011 Paul

I agree that not everything can be centralized and our systems are among them. As soon as you shift things offsite, you multiply the issues around continuity of operations and data security. This effort has also taken some key systems permanantly offline without warning or a chance to comment and it makes me wonder who is reaching these decisions and should we be worried that people with no knowledge of the systems decides their fate.

Wed, Nov 30, 2011 GovtMIA

I have no problem considering DISA first if only the model that is used is from the DISA mold. What if it does not fit? If all that DISA did was to REALLY manage SLA's for the programs, that would be a blessing. Instead, they oversee efforts that the program does. What good is that? Besides, they cannot even give you a simple cost analysis that is consistent day to day.

Tue, Nov 29, 2011

I find this whole thing interesting. Our agency is looking at using DISA also. Unfortunately I have a couple of issues: 1) We cannot seem to get a straight answer on costs. 2) We provide SAS for our customers on a cost reimbursement basis. If DISA's charge for server support exceeds what we charge our customers will say bye. 3) DISA has a very good ability to bring contractors on it seem almost at will. I understand from friends that are DISA employees that if the contract employee works out the a GS position magically appears. I guess I would just like to know who is watching the fox while the fox is looking to devoure the hen house (DoD)?

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above