Workforce expert: Third year of pay freeze likely to happen

The Senate killed the bill that threatened to tack an additional three years to the current two-year federal pay freeze, but government workers could still see the same sort of legislation resurrected over the next couple of months.

Introduced by Republican Sen. Dean Heller (R-Nev.), the Temporary Tax Holiday and Government Reduction Act proposed adding an extra three years to the ongoing two-year pay freeze, as well as cut the federal workforce by 10 percent by attrition by 2015. Heller called his proposal a practical solution but other lawmakers disagree, with the Senate striking down the bill Dec. 1 in a 78-20 vote.

“I’m disappointed that my colleagues have chosen to forgo a common-sense solution in order to score political points,” Heller said in a statement. “Now that this vote has been taken, it’s time to work together to ensure the payroll tax cut is extended for American workers.”

But federal employees seeing the Senate's rejection as the tiniest respite amid increasingly gloomy conditions should not expect to be out of the woods just yet, said John Palguta, vice president of policy at the Partnership for Public Service

“These proposals are going to keep coming up in different forms and formulations,” he said. “Frankly, there isn’t enough money to go around, and it’s going to be really difficult to get any revenue enhancements so they’re going to have to find budget reductions somewhere and it’s going to be from almost everywhere.”

An extended federal pay freeze is likely to happen, Palguta said, and proposals suggesting just that will emerge over the next couple of months. Many of the agencies’ big ticket items do not have appropriations yet, and wrangling over those and other budget reductions are issues that will be presented in the near future, he added.

“I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if we saw at least a third year of pay freeze, maybe longer” Palguta said. “I would hope that we would not see this very arbitrary meat axe approach, across-the-board cuts to the size of the workforce because it never works. It’s short-sighted and damage often occurs to program delivery.”

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Tue, Dec 20, 2011

So isn't it about time for all federal workers to come together and vote everyone of the freeloaders in washington out of office that votes to take money out of their pockets and put it in the politians corner?

Fri, Dec 16, 2011 Bill Newport,RI

I feel your pain...It should be noted that CSRS retirees received no COLA for the past three years.

Thu, Dec 8, 2011

Cap contractor salaries that work on government contracts to maximum government SES with benefit level and there should be a drop in either costs or bids on projects. Really, the only way to reduce costs is to scale back the missions. The missions' were greatly increased in 2009. Why is it that neither party gets this?

Thu, Dec 8, 2011

Business as usual - get all of the low hanging fruit so you look good right away, but in the end the real problem is not addressed and you are dealing with it a few years later. Put together real viable solutions - remove SS payoroll cap up $1,000,0000, keep cap on max SS pays out to high wage earners. Apply a single retirement formula for all Civil Servants to include Congress and staffers, and these indviduals cannot collect on their retirement until age 65-67; unless you are CSRS.

Wed, Dec 7, 2011 dahhuh RDU

Its time to sunset the Bush tax cuts completely...everyone pays. With some leadrship on both sides the illimination of corporate personage, professional lobbyist and corprate money from elections we can reclaim our founding fathers vision of America.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above