GOP budget plan gets thumbs-up from House panel

The Republican budget proposal that aims to extend the current federal pay freeze through 2015 and cut the workforce by 10 percent is one step closer to becoming reality.

The plan, released March 20 by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wisc), was approved by the House Budget Committee by a narrow margin -- 19 to 18  -- and is now headed for a vote on the House floor.

Titled the Path to Prosperity, the plan counters the Obama administration's budget request unveiled in February, which would end the pay freeze and bump up the salaries of civilian federal employees by a modest 0.5 percent.

In addition to cutting the federal workforce by 10 percent over the next three years, Ryan’s blueprint also calls for federal employees to make a higher contribution to their retirement plans. It would also target hundreds of federal programs “that have outlived their usefulness” in an effort to streamline government agencies, the proposal said.  

After its release, the plan quickly drew criticism from federal union leaders to top government officials. Colleen Kelly, national president of the National Treasury Employees Union, called the $368 billion in cuts to federal employees’ compensation to pay for tax breaks for the wealthy “unconscionable.” 

“Our civil service is one of the best in the world,” she wrote in a March 21 letter to members of the House Budget Committee. “Such a civil service will not survive if these cuts are instituted.”

Jeffrey Zients, acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote that Obama has already signed into law cuts that bring nonsecurity spending to its lowest level as a share of the economy since Dwight Eisenhower served as president. In a March 21 blog post,  he further argued that this category of spending would be reduced as a share of economy by 50 percent from 2010 to 2022 under Obama's plan.

“But when it comes to annual, non-defense spending, the House Budget Resolution is not about cutting fat,” Zients commented. “It is cutting deep into the muscle that America needs to compete and win in the 21st century.”

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

2014 Rising Star Awards

Help us find the next generation of leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Thu, Mar 29, 2012

I agree with Foster - Paul Ryan's budget isn't closer to reality, but it won't be "another piece of legislative gridlock just like every other piece of legislation that has been offered by both parties" - we know Harry Reid won't give it a hearing so there's no grid to lock. I also agree with the first commenter than congressional budgets need to be cut, but I'd cut Harry Reid's for sitting around picking his nose before I's cut Paul Ryan's. And to Colleen Kelly and her statement that "our civil sdervice is the best in the world" I say it should be with 180,000 of them making $150K a year - they'll probably qualify to pay Obama's tax as the "wealthy." I can't speak for anyone else, but I remember the SEC employees watching pron 8 hours a day and not even getting disciplined, much less fired as they should have been.

Fri, Mar 23, 2012

As I have said in other post these austerity measures are fine if they include ALL federal employees including Congress, the President, military members (I know personnel cuts have been anounced but I have seen nothing on pay freezes), congressional and presidential staffs (appointed and otherwise). In other words EVERYONE. I doubt congressman Ryan meant to include stopping and cutting the size of his staff.

Fri, Mar 23, 2012 Foster Huntsville

"The Republican budget proposal ..... is one step closer to becoming reality." Really? What journalism school did you attend? My opinion is that the Republican budget proposal is one step closer to becoming another peice of legislative grid-lock....just like every other peice of legislation that has been offered by both parties. As long as the House and Senate are held by seperate parties, and the President is a Democrat, and espacially due to the ridiculous ecenomic positions put forth in this Ryan proposal, I can comfortably assure you Ryan's budget proposal is no closer to becoming reality. Of course, this is my opinion and is only stated as such. How about just the facts when reporting on similar matters.....

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above