Who needs 21 e-mail systems?

The focal point of the newly released Shared IT Services Strategy is to slash technology duplication and waste across the whole government, something that’s badly needed, according to one CIO.

Federal technology leaders spend “a disproportionate amount” of their time on managing commodity IT, said U.S. CIO Steven VanRoekel. A year ago, the Agriculture Department had 21 e-mail systems across its infrastructure, 21 different e-mail administrators running them, and 21 different teams managing those systems, said VanRoekel, who spoke at InformationWeek’s Government IT Leadership Forum on May 3.

USDA "took the bold, cultural step to consolidate, taking 21 data center systems to one cloud-based system,” he said. “It’s a third of the cost -- $24 per month per mailbox to $8 per month per mailbox.”

By consolidating something simple as e-mail services, an agency such as USDA can save $500 million, “and what’s amazing about government is that that’s not a natural motion,” VanRoekel said.

“In the private sector, it would be unthinkable for an organization to have 21 different e-mail systems,” he said. “We really need to push across the government and look at opportunities to take these systems where there’s rampant duplication and go in and strip those down.”

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

2014 Rising Star Awards

Help us find the next generation of leaders in federal IT.

Reader comments

Fri, May 4, 2012 markvon Tucson

Yes. Reduce the numbers to 1 data center and watch your up-time go from 100% to something significantly less. That's what has happened in my organization. We now get to watch our email system seasaw up and down all week long, with delays as high as 4 hours. We are doing less with less and getting less.

Fri, May 4, 2012

In private business cost-savings pull groups to better solutions because the $$ saved be easily be flexed to better things by *the person who saveed the $$*. In budget-driven govt, groups must be pushed because the group isn't saving $$ (they get no return) but rather lose people & power. The incentives are all wrong.

Fri, May 4, 2012

amazing grasp of the obvious

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above