Contract audits may save millions for GSA, IG says

The General Services Administration could save up to $266 million in the first half of fiscal 2012 through pre-award audits that its Office of the Inspector General has conducted, according to an IG report.

Auditors went through 26 GSA contracts worth nearly $7 billion to provide contracting officers with vital and current information that helps them at the negotiation table, according to the OIG’s Semiannual Report to Congress. The report was released May 31.

GSA officials approved nearly all the savings.

Five of the more significant audits were of Multiple Award Schedule contracts with projected governmentwide sales totaling more than $5.1 billion. These audits resulted in recommendations of $222 million in funds to be put to better use.

Auditors found in the five cases that the Price Reductions Clause was ineffective. They found either too few sales by other companies that sell the same product or service, a contractor proposed exclusions to the clause that were too broad, or sales were all to the government, not the private sector.

In the report, the OIG listed as its chief achievement in the first half of the year the $199.5 million settlement with Oracle Corp. The case dealt with allegations that the company intentionally didn't tell federal officials about discounts it offered to commercial customers.

The semiannual report covered Oct. 1, 2011, to March 31, 2012.

Since October, the OIG issued 45 audit reports and recommended over $316 million in funds be put to better use and also questioned costs. It also made 486 referrals for criminal prosecution, civil litigation, and administrative action.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

The 2014 Federal 100

FCW is very pleased to profile the women and men who make up this year's Fed 100. 

Reader comments

Tue, Jun 5, 2012 Henry

the "savings" is roughly 4% (266million/7billion), most folks who have been through a GSA audit would state that the "cost savings" calculator the auditors use tends to overstate the savings. The hidden cost in all of this is the time and money spent by the auditors and the time and money by industry. The Hill eats up these reports, but I wish they would dig a little deeper.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above