Transparency credited for preventing Recovery Act fraud

The high level scrutiny on the allocation, management and spending of Recovery Act funds resulted in unprecedented levels of transparency and minimized the risk of fraud, waste and abuse, according to the former chairman of the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.

Speaking at a June 12 panel discussion organized by the Partnership for Public Service on lessons learned of the Recovery Act, Earl Devaney highlighted how the increased attention – by citizens, politicians and media alike -- on where Recovery Act money was spent deterred potential fraud from occurring.

“With that kind of money, the fraud was extraordinary low,” he said. “I think that the biggest factor was transparency; there was so much sunlight on this money that the bad guys just said to themselves, ‘We’ll just continue to steal Medicaid money. What the heck, it’s pretty easy!’”

Congress passed the Recovery Act in 2009 as a response to the economic crisis. The primary goals were to boost job growth, spur economic activity and promote unprecedented levels of accountability and transparency in federal spending.

The transparency piece “is a force multiplier,” Devaney said. “On the accountability side, I think that the biggest lesson learned, is the shift from merely detecting fraud, waste and abuse to trying to actually prevent it.”

Devaney, who formerly served as an inspector general at the Interior Department, said when the goal is just to detect fraud and abuse, IG are “naturally very aggressive” about performing that mission. However, when the objective is to prevent fraud, agencies and IGs come together for “remarkable collaboration,” he said.

“Both of them came eagerly to the table, trying to prevent loss in the pre-award stage,” he said.

President Barack Obama in February 2009 named Devaney to lead the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, a position he held until 2012 when he announced his retirement.

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

Who's Fed 100-worthy?

Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!

Featured

Reader comments

Wed, Jun 13, 2012

Transparency is subjective Mr. Devaney. "Primary goals were to boost job growth, spur economic activity". America is still waiting to be shown where the money was spent as neither of the goals were even close to being met. Now America is much further in debt with nothing to show for it.

Wed, Jun 13, 2012 From

This appears to be political grandstanding and pounding our chests. After the past few years I am more wary than I've ever been at claims by any governmental agency. When president Obama signed that $787B, I knew there was going to be fraud. This is arm waving. Show us data and let us decide.

Wed, Jun 13, 2012 John Denver

Unfortunately we didn't filter for the biggest scammers of the entire deal - the financial institutions that received boat loads of our funds for little of no finance charge. Now we see the thank you from the institutions as they allow middle America to die off. I've been responsible with my money, have nearly no credit dept, have $100k of equity in my house, and the greedy financial institutions won't loan me much of anything (yes, I have a job)...thanks guys. I guess my kids will just have to rob banks for a living...

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above