Sequestration

House GOP rebuffs call to address sequestration

US CapitolRep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) tried to call for Congress to return to work during the House's Oct. 16 pro forma session, but was rebuffed by Republicans, who quickly gaveled the House closed until Oct. 19.

Connolly and Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-Mo.) announced their plans to pose a parliamentary inquiry earlier in the day, saying they would ask whether the Speaker of the House has the authority to recall the House during the current recess to address sequestration. Connolly led the House -- or rather, then nearly empty House chamber -- in the pledge of allegiance, and then attempted to raise the issue.

But Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.), the acting speaker for the day's session, did not acknowledge the request and immediately declared the House adjourned.

A statement released by the office of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that Beutler was "under orders from House Speaker John Boehner,” (R-Ohio), to ignore the request.  And Connolly repeated his warning that more than a quarter-million federal employees and a half-million federal contract employees could face layoffs.

“You would think that the House Republican leadership would understand that it is time to put politics aside and do what’s best for our country and our citizens right now,” Connolly said.

House Democrats have repeatedly made an issue of Congress' early adjournment this fall. Both chambers will reconvene for a lame duck session after the elections, but Republicans have consistently refused to be engaged by what they say is partisan posturing by the House minority. The fact that Beutler, as acting speaker, declined to recognize Connelly to speak means there will be no trace of Connolly’s attempted comments in the official congressional record.

And the pro forma sessions themselves are a partisan standoff of sorts. The primary reason the House has not formally adjourned is to guard against recess appointments by President Barack Obama.

About the Author

Connect with the FCW staff on Twitter @FCWnow.

Reader comments

Wed, Oct 17, 2012

I hadn't realized that this was a political rag. Perhaps you should change your name to indicate your party affiliation.

Wed, Oct 17, 2012

It is obvious that Connolly was doing a political ploy. When the Dems had control of the House they treated the Republicans far worse. From what I have seen, whenever Dems are calling for Republicans "to put politics aside" it means that they want things done according to their liberal politics. For Dems "what’s best for our country and our citizens " usually means the opposite - turning the U.S. into a socialist, bankrupt (morally and fiscally) country in which they have all the power.

Wed, Oct 17, 2012 Bill

Clearly a political article. Be careful FCW. In these times of a highly polarized citizenry about half are liberal and half conservative, you are talking to only half of your readers. What about the other half. What is the "rest of the story"? Why would the House have to protect against Obama appointments during a recess? How did Nancy Pelosi know the orders came down from Boehner? Why is there a quote from a democrat and none from a republican to tell their side? How did we get to this sequestration in the first place? All the president had to do was agree with the republicans on a deal last year. One single man could have headed off sequestration. Much easier than getting 535 to agree on a different path. As a result the federal workforce is in for "white knuckles" time due to one man. Try to appear (no try to be) more moderate to avoid the appearance of taking a side.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above