Budget Outlook

DOD begins planning for fiscal cliff

Marching feet

The Defense Department warns that sequestration will harm troops returning from war and the programs they depend on. (Stock image by David Freund)

The Defense Department earlier this week received guidance from the Office for Management and Budget to officially begin planning for the spending cuts expected from sequestration, according to DOD.

“We are consulting with the Office of Management and Budget and have been instructed to pursue internal planning on sequestration,” George Little, DOD spokesman, said in a Dec. 5 press conference. “We are at the very start. We don’t have all of the details firmed up. Naturally, we hope very much that sequestration will be avoided. We don’t want to go off the fiscal cliff.”

Until now, DOD leadership, at least publicly, had continued its financial planning using the fiscal 2013 budget, which did not include the roughly 10 percent cuts sequestration is set to institute. Over the course of 10 years, the process would shave about $500 billion from DOD spending, in addition to $487 billion in spending reductions already planned.

Little said it is unlikely that the effects of sequestration, which was mandated in last year’s Budget Control Act as the consequence of the failure of a so-called "supercommittee" of lawmakers to agree on what could have been a more targeted set of budget cuts, will be felt immediately upon its Jan. 2 implementation. Instead, it is more probable there will be a period at the beginning of 2013 to sort out the specifics and implement new policies.

“We are going to have to do some detailed planning at some point on the numbers and the specific consequences of sequestration, which we’ve anticipated and already talked about,” Little said. “We expect in our planning efforts to identify not just numbers, but how we communicate to our 3 million-plus workforce, to prepare them for what may come down the pike.”

In a joint appearance with Secretary of Veteran's Affairs Eric Shinseki in Washington on Dec. 6, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who has been vocal in his opposition to the measure, vowed that if leaders in Washington cannot come to an agreement halting sequestration it will have major impact on troops returning from war and the programs supporting them.

At a Dec. 3 appearance at National Defense University, Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter described sequestration as “chaotic, wasteful, and damaging to every function of government and should not take place.”

Little echoed those comments at the Dec. 5 press conference, but did express some hope that a worst-case scenario may be avoided.

“If this is triggered, even in light of this absurd mechanism that was created to avoid absurdities, our intent is to not implement sequestration in an absurd way … inside the Department of Defense,” Little said. “Hopefully, Congress will come to resolution on sequestration, but we have looked at those impacts and will plan against them.”

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

The 2014 Federal 100

FCW is very pleased to profile the women and men who make up this year's Fed 100. 

Reader comments

Wed, Dec 12, 2012

How about cutting stove-pipe and legacy systems? Has anyone looked at the amount of $$$ to be saved by eliminating stove-pipe systems? We can't afford DoD system territorial wars anymore. How about that enterprise environment for all DoD systems??????

Tue, Dec 11, 2012

They offer to some jobs in the USAF a 15 year retirement but only 35%, why wouldnt you just stay another 5 years to get 100%?

Sat, Dec 8, 2012

Long past time to do a blank-sheet-of-paper reorg of DoD. Let the services keep their (wasteful) seperate styles of uniforms, but combine the support and back office and command and control functions. Do we REALLY need five seperate supply systems and major commands to be the base landlords? There is LOTS of low-hanging fruit to be had.

Thu, Dec 6, 2012 sa tx

Just FYI, not sure the uniforms in the picture are US DoD uniforms. You might want to double check. Dont know if anyone else will pick up ob that, but personally it would make me feel that it is just.further proof of how out on touch the 98 or 99% of the civilian population is out if touch with the 1 or 2% of the military population.

Thu, Dec 6, 2012 tx

My suggestion still stands at offering all DOD active military FULL retirement benefits for 15 plus yrs service. Not the partial retirement plan of staggered percentages that is being offered now. DoD will save because ther extra 5 or so years of COL and additional rank costs will be avoided.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above