Transparency

OMB guidance promised to ensure USASpending accuracy

USASpending chart

USASpending.gov provides a wide range of agency spending data, but serious accuracy problems have been found. As OMB Controller Danny Werfel noted when promising improvements, 'It doesn’t matter how great your charts are or how awesomely relevant this information is if it lacks reliability.'

Just days after a watchdog found that agencies had misreported more than $1.55 trillion on USASpending.gov, a senior Office of Management and Budget official pledged to improve the numbers in the online portal that shows how taxpayer dollars are spent.

Speaking at AGA’s National Leadership Conference on Feb. 13, Danny Werfel, controller at OMB, spoke of data transparency as a major priority for both his agency and Congress, and dealing with the lack of standardization across government.

"We’re going to start at OMB, on the priority of complete and reliable data on USASpending," he said. As the "the most prominent touchpoint" between the public and government financial information, Werfel stressed, the portal needs to have accurate, dependable information.

"It’s like…Maslow’s hierarchy and children: Everything starts with health," he said. "You want your children to be healthy, and everything after that is a bonus. In financial management, I feel like that with reliability – you want to start with sound information. It doesn’t matter how great your charts are or how awesomely relevant this information is if it lacks reliability, because then you’ve done exponential damage by sharing it and leading to decisions, information and views that aren’t grounded in a sound foundation."

OMB will "in the near term" issue guidance to drive agencies toward internal control reviews around the reliability of their USASpending reporting, Werfel said. That data should be compared to information currently in audited federal financial management systems or other trusted sources.

"Right now, across government we can’t do that in a consistent way," he said. "We have to do that very manually; it’s not something that comes easy to agencies, so we’re working on figuring out how to create that reconciliation."

Standardization should help, Werfel noted, but he added that it needs to be done right. "My question has always been, where do we start? I just don’t want to standardize for the sake of standardization. I don’t want to standardize one piece if the return on investment is 20 years away; I’d rather standardize where there’s a more immediate return."

About the Author

Camille Tuutti is a former FCW staff writer who covered federal oversight and the workforce.

The 2014 Federal 100

Get to know the 100 women and men honored this year for going above and beyond in federal IT.

Reader comments

Mon, Feb 18, 2013 Dennis D. McDonald, Ph.D. http://www.ddmcd.com/developing.html

If it is really true that standardization lies at the heart of transparency, then we have to deal with the fact that standardization may take years to put in place. Meanwhile, we need to make the process of developing and implementing the standards more transparent.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above