2013 Fed 100
The power of the individual informs FCW's coverage each and every day, but with the Federal 100, we take time to really spotlight and celebrate it. Federal IT would not function without people like this year's Fed 100. And at a time when optimism can be hard to muster in government, their stories are a refreshing reminder of what one person can make possible.
Find Winners by selecting the first letter of their last name or view the complete list.
E-Mail this page
Nominations are now open for the 2015 Federal 100 awards. Get the details and submit your picks!
Make a nomination today
GSA's administrator talks with FCW about short-term hiring, long-term planning and Robert Frost.
Without a future vision and an appetite for risk, reforms lead down a rabbit hole. There is a better way.
VA's top tech official says he is balancing risks while trying to keep the department's online services open for business.
After five years on the job, the founding director of the Office of Government Information Services believes that a deeper understanding and acceptance of FOIA is seeping into the federal government.
The September attack, made public Nov. 10, potentially puts customer and employee personal information at risk, including addresses, Social Security numbers and emails.
The General Services Administration's Matthew Goodrich predicts more agency-driven authorizations and previews a new two-year road map.
Archie Mackie became product director of enterprise computing at the Army PEO EIS in June. In a Nov. 7 interview with FCW, he explained why the Army is cautious but hopeful in its adoption of the cloud.
While IT procurement and design are already quite centralized under the Office of Information and Technology, sources tell FCW that telemedicine IT and app development at the Veterans Health Administration will be rolled up under the OI&T as well.
Steve Kelman argues that the best place to improve federal procurements is at the beginning.
Agree on the need to explain the criteria. Also would like to see them sorted by agency in addition to alpha. Homeland Security, OMB and GSA seem to dominate the list, which may say something about the focus of federal IT.
Kay Clarey has presided for a decade over a program, UFMS, which has cost the American taxpayers nearly a quarter of a Billion dollars, has never had an accepted business case in over a decade, has had numerous inquiries and *not* clean audits by OMB, and yet which serves only 6 of the DOJ's 40 components? It didn't come in on time. And it didn't come in on budget. In fact, for most of its life it didn't have a budget. And she's awarded this prize? To answer the previous question, the prize, in this case, was awarded based upon the smoke an mirrors writeup submitted by departmental bureaucrats who have supported this waste of funds for ten years. This is "Quicken" for the DOJ, it's not that hard, and it shouldn't cost $250Million to do. And DOJ shouldn't be rewarded for anything related to it.
What is the criteria to be selected -?
Are chosen for government leadership based on what?
8609 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 500Vienna, VA 22182-2215 703-876-5100
© 1996-2013 1105 Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only.To order presentation-ready copies for distribution to colleagues, clients or customers, visit: www.1105Reprints.com