Deja vu: Budget battle looms

Obama and the budget

Obama's opposition to House appropriations bills signals that another long summer of contention over funding the government is likely. (FCW image)

President Obama would veto the House versions of appropriations bills funding Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs and military construction, in part because the measures maintain the freeze on federal civilian pay, according to a pair of June 3 policy statements from the Office of Management and Budget. That announcement is the latest move in what is shaping up to be another protracted battle on funding the federal government for fiscal year 2014.

The administration wants the House to nominate conferees to reconcile the House and Senate budgets before starting work on appropriations bills. That seems increasingly unlikely in the current political climate, especially considering the gulf between the two budgets. The House cuts taxes and uses spending levels under sequestration as the baseline for the federal budget, while the Senate version raises taxes and restores cuts made under the Budget Control Act.

The President’s budget steers a course between the two chambers, but tilts toward the Senate version, with increased revenues from changes to the tax code, including limits on deductions enjoyed by the wealthiest taxpayers, and a proposed one percent pay hike for civilian federal employees.

The administration has a list of specific objections to the individual bills, and some points of praise as well. But the main complaint appears to be that maintaining the spending framework of sequestration, "would hurt our economy and require draconian cuts to middle-class priorities." Regardless, House appropriators are moving full steam ahead on the suite of bills to fund the government, releasing funding bills for Defense and Agriculture on June 4.

About the Author

Adam Mazmanian is FCW's senior staff writer, and covers Congress, health IT and governmentwide IT policy. Connect with him on Twitter: @thisismaz.

The 2015 Federal 100

Meet 100 women and men who are doing great things in federal IT.


  • Shutterstock image (by venimo): e-learning concept image, digital content and online webinar icons.

    Can MOOCs make the grade for federal training?

    Massive open online courses can offer specialized IT instruction on a flexible schedule and on the cheap. That may not always mesh with government's preference for structure and certification, however.

  • Shutterstock image (by edel): graduation cap and diploma.

    Cybersecurity: 6 schools with the right stuff

    The federal government craves more cybersecurity professionals. These six schools are helping meet that demand.

  • Rick Holgate

    Holgate to depart ATF

    Former ACT president will take a job with Gartner, follow his spouse to Vienna, Austria.

  • Are VA techies slacking off on Yammer?

    A new IG report cites security and productivity concerns associated with employees' use of the popular online collaboration tool.

  • Shutterstock image: digital fingerprint, cyber crime.

    Exclusive: The OPM breach details you haven't seen

    An official timeline of the Office of Personnel Management breach obtained by FCW pinpoints the hackers’ calibrated extraction of data, and the government's step-by-step response.

  • Stephen Warren

    Deputy CIO Warren exits VA

    The onetime acting CIO at Veterans Affairs will be taking over CIO duties at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

  • Shutterstock image: monitoring factors of healthcare.

    DOD awards massive health records contract

    Leidos, Accenture and Cerner pull off an unexpected win of the multi-billion-dollar Defense Healthcare Management System Modernization contract, beating out the presumptive health-records leader.

  • Sweating the OPM data breach -- Illustration by Dragutin Cvijanovic

    Sweating the stolen data

    Millions of background-check records were compromised, OPM now says. Here's the jaw-dropping range of personal data that was exposed.

  • FCW magazine

    Let's talk about Alliant 2

    The General Services Administration is going to great lengths to gather feedback on its IT services GWAC. Will it make for a better acquisition vehicle?

Reader comments

Wed, Jun 5, 2013

Only bad Government leaders rely on proposed "increased revenues from changes to the tax code" to balanace their spending. This is fantasy accounting and they all should know it by now. Every projected "increased revenues" from new taxes has always been much less than these people claim it will be. Oboma and the DEMS just want to "tax and spend" more - as usual - but never will take any responsibility for their incompetence and dishonesty. I am not crazy about the Rebuplicans, but the DEMS make them look good by comparison once you have worked through all the biased reporting trying to make the DEMS look good. These people also need to get over the false idea that this bloated spending "would hurt our economy and require draconian cuts to middle-class priorities." Excessive long-term spending is not about helping the economy and the middle-class (because it does not), but about power for themselves.

Wed, Jun 5, 2013

Not again! Have all Republican house membrs Aaccepted so many donatioons from business that they are afraid to do away with even the most gross tax inequities?

Wed, Jun 5, 2013 Terrell Waters Herndon, Va

In my view itl's rediculous that the house will not do their part by cutting back the disproportionate tax breaks long enjoyed by ththe wealthy.

Wed, Jun 5, 2013 Terrell Waters Herndon

Here we go again It is rediculus that the GOP is so adamant ab out not cutting back the dispropiate tax breaks tax breaks for the wealthy

Wed, Jun 5, 2013

OMG. Enough already. A good leader knows how to entice even his/her adversaries to work with him/her. Please, lead Mr. President. Stop acting like you're the head of the democrat party and LEAD the entire nation for once.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above